Re: [Ktechlab-devel] broke SVN. =(

2008-11-16 Thread P Zoltan
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:47:09 +0100, Alan Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks much, > > I think the issue here is visibility. > > Assumptions 1 and 2: All Circuit stuff is in the electronics directory, > All Flow part stuff is in the flow part directory. > > Assumption 3: Stuff in electr

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] broke SVN. =(

2008-11-16 Thread Alan Grimes
P Zoltan wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:36:18 +0100, Alan Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Sorry, I broke the SVN by recklessly moving circuit document into the >> same directory as its parent class... >> >> It broke a bunch of linking stuff, which exposed a __HUGE CAN OF WORMS__. >> >

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] broke SVN. =(

2008-11-16 Thread P Zoltan
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:36:18 +0100, Alan Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I broke the SVN by recklessly moving circuit document into the > same directory as its parent class... > > It broke a bunch of linking stuff, which exposed a __HUGE CAN OF WORMS__. > I didn't test much, but ex

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] broke SVN. =(

2008-11-16 Thread P Zoltan
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:36:18 +0100, Alan Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I broke the SVN by recklessly moving circuit document into the > same directory as its parent class... > > It broke a bunch of linking stuff, which exposed a __HUGE CAN OF WORMS__. > > Apparently a buch of classe

[Ktechlab-devel] broke SVN. =(

2008-11-15 Thread Alan Grimes
Sorry, I broke the SVN by recklessly moving circuit document into the same directory as its parent class... It broke a bunch of linking stuff, which exposed a __HUGE CAN OF WORMS__. Apparently a buch of classes in the *FLOWPARTS* branch of the tree was using CircuitICNDocument instead of FlowICND