On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:47:09 +0100, Alan Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Thanks much,
>
> I think the issue here is visibility.
>
> Assumptions 1 and 2: All Circuit stuff is in the electronics directory,
> All Flow part stuff is in the flow part directory.
>
> Assumption 3: Stuff in electr
P Zoltan wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:36:18 +0100, Alan Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I broke the SVN by recklessly moving circuit document into the
>> same directory as its parent class...
>>
>> It broke a bunch of linking stuff, which exposed a __HUGE CAN OF WORMS__.
>>
>
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:36:18 +0100, Alan Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Sorry, I broke the SVN by recklessly moving circuit document into the
> same directory as its parent class...
>
> It broke a bunch of linking stuff, which exposed a __HUGE CAN OF WORMS__.
>
I didn't test much, but ex
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:36:18 +0100, Alan Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Sorry, I broke the SVN by recklessly moving circuit document into the
> same directory as its parent class...
>
> It broke a bunch of linking stuff, which exposed a __HUGE CAN OF WORMS__.
>
> Apparently a buch of classe
Sorry, I broke the SVN by recklessly moving circuit document into the
same directory as its parent class...
It broke a bunch of linking stuff, which exposed a __HUGE CAN OF WORMS__.
Apparently a buch of classes in the *FLOWPARTS* branch of the tree was
using CircuitICNDocument instead of FlowICND