Re: [Ktechlab-devel] unit test.

2009-06-22 Thread Alan Grimes
P Zoltan wrote: > Finally I have some time for this issue. Looking through the source, it > seems a litte under-documented (inline) for me and also I'm not very happy > with the name of different identifiers; first I'd like to add some > comments and doxygen documentation. What kind of codi

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] unit test.

2009-06-22 Thread P Zoltan
Finally I have some time for this issue. Looking through the source, it seems a litte under-documented (inline) for me and also I'm not very happy with the name of different identifiers; first I'd like to add some comments and doxygen documentation. What kind of coding standards should w

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] unit test.

2009-06-09 Thread Alan Grimes
> Thanks for the documentation. In my opinion all these should be > documented in detail in the wiki. If there was a wiki :\ It's extensively documented in the literature. I have at least three different textbooks which cover it. =P > Another important aspect of the simulator is how the com

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] unit test.

2009-06-09 Thread P Zoltan
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:54:38 +0200, Alan Grimes wrote: > >> The thing is that I don't get the "big picture": that is that matrix, >> a,b, ... >> >> I'll have to read some docs in the topic... Do you recommend >> something? > > The engine does something like this: > > http://en.wikipedia.o

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] unit test.

2009-06-08 Thread Alan Grimes
>> The code was fairly heavily commented >> >> I just submitted a new version which simply sets A to the identity >> matrix and b to 0 1 2 3 4 5... >> That actually passes! But it only tests the most degenerate case. >> >> What you basically want to do is set all values in A and b to some >> r

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] unit test.

2009-06-08 Thread P Zoltan
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:26:34 +0200, Alan Grimes wrote: > P Zoltan wrote: >>> It has two major problems: >>> >>> 1. the code to put random values in the matrix and vector has not been >>> implemented. > >> Easy to fix, but I have no idea what is going on there; maybe you >> should >> documen

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] unit test.

2009-06-07 Thread Alan Grimes
P Zoltan wrote: >> It has two major problems: >> >> 1. the code to put random values in the matrix and vector has not been >> implemented. > Easy to fix, but I have no idea what is going on there; maybe you should > document it. =\ The code was fairly heavily commented I just submitted

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] unit test.

2009-06-07 Thread P Zoltan
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:20:24 +0200, Alan Grimes wrote: > I roughed out the unit test for libktechmath and put it in SVN. > > It has two major problems: > > 1. the code to put random values in the matrix and vector has not been > implemented. > Easy to fix, but I have no idea what is going on

[Ktechlab-devel] unit test.

2009-06-05 Thread Alan Grimes
I roughed out the unit test for libktechmath and put it in SVN. It has two major problems: 1. the code to put random values in the matrix and vector has not been implemented. 2. there are some configuration problems with the makefiles, they aren't linking against certain key libraries, that real