Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Abstraction and properties of components

2010-10-31 Thread Zoltan Padrah
Thanks for the answers. After thinking more about this, I came to the conclusion that a generic controller for all the components should be enough, so I'll go with the second option, based on associated property objects. This way a generic controller should be enough for all the components, and

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Abstraction and properties of components

2010-10-29 Thread Julian Bäume
moin, okay, here is what I’ve done on this topic. It just shows, how the properties will be permanently stored to be re-used by our users, later. Of course there can (and most likely will) be some classes to collect all the information needed. Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2010, 23:31:11 schrieb

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Abstraction and properties of components

2010-10-29 Thread Julian Bäume
Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2010, 23:53:07 schrieb Alan Grimes: > > Currently I don't know which way of implementation is better. Any ideas > > on this? > > Hmm, let's compare circuit and component: > > > A circuit is a collection of interconnected components in a circuit > document. > > A compo

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Abstraction and properties of components

2010-10-28 Thread Alan Grimes
> Currently I don't know which way of implementation is better. Any ideas on > this? Hmm, let's compare circuit and component: A circuit is a collection of interconnected components in a circuit document. A component can be thought of as a hard-coded sub-circuit that contains zero, one or man