> There is an unreleased 0.3.7 version in the SVN, in a separate branch,
> ready to be released...
>
> I'd recommend to create package from that version, too.
>
I had not yet noticed earlyer but ktechlab 0.3.7 has been submitted into
Ubuntu Karmic (development version) one week ago. Someone at d
On Tue, 26 May 2009 19:36:26 +0200, Niels Egberts
wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, there are some pretty awful versions in SVN right now. As of this
>> instant, head is not too
>> bad but I'm planning to post an outline for stabilizing it in a day or
>> two.
>
>
> Thats great!
>
> I love ktechlab, too bad
>
> Yeah, there are some pretty awful versions in SVN right now. As of this
> instant, head is not too
> bad but I'm planning to post an outline for stabilizing it in a day or two.
Thats great!
I love ktechlab, too bad there has not been a release for some time
now. But I'm
confident that we'll
Niels Egberts wrote:
> Ive finished a .deb. For now I have only compiled a 64-bit version.
>
> Ive compiled ktechlab without arts and there is no menu entry in gnome
> yet. If you find a bug (regarding to the package) you can just mail me.
> Mind that the source is a randomly chosen svn version, s
Ive finished a .deb. For now I have only compiled a 64-bit version.
Ive compiled ktechlab without arts and there is no menu entry in gnome yet.
If you find a bug (regarding to the package) you can just mail me. Mind that
the source is a randomly chosen svn version, so ktechlab might be unstable.
(y
I will put it on the mailing list when I'm done :-).
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Lawrence Shafer wrote:
> If you will send me the *.deb I'll put it on the website.
>
> Lawrence
>
> Niels Egberts wrote:
>
> Super! Without arts it compiles just fine :-)
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:43 PM, P
If you will send me the *.deb I'll put it on the website.
Lawrence
Niels Egberts wrote:
Super! Without arts it compiles just fine :-)
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:43 PM, P Zoltan
wrote:
Now it should work (revision 353 in SVN). If it doesn't, please let us
know
Super! Without arts it compiles just fine :-)
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:43 PM, P Zoltan wrote:
>
> Now it should work (revision 353 in SVN). If it doesn't, please let us
> know.
>
>
> On Sun, 24 May 2009 15:33:30 +0200, Niels Egberts
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to compile ktechlab
Now it should work (revision 353 in SVN). If it doesn't, please let us
know.
On Sun, 24 May 2009 15:33:30 +0200, Niels Egberts
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to compile ktechlab in Ubuntu Jaunty so I can create an .deb
> out
> of it for other people. But at ./configure I get this:
>
>
On Sun, 24 May 2009 15:33:30 +0200, Niels Egberts
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to compile ktechlab in Ubuntu Jaunty so I can create an .deb
> out
> of it for other people. But at ./configure I get this:
>
> checking for mcopidl... not found
> configure: error: The important program mcopidl
10 matches
Mail list logo