Hi,
while being busy working on the kde4 port, I somehow forgot about the 0.3.7
release. To push this forward I just commit some changes to the about-box. I
didn't put any e-mail data into it, because I wasn't sure which addresses to
use and if I am allowed to publish it. I also hope, I got all
Hi,
as I mentioned before, I've been working on moving KTechLab to use
kdevplatform as a base to provide some general features like project
management, plugin handling, document handling, unified look&feel, some
language support, debuggers,...
Some days ago, I read a mail on the kdevelop-devel
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:14:18 +0100, Julian Bäume wrote:
> Hi,
> while being busy working on the kde4 port,
Where do we do the brainstorming? I have a few ideas, but don't know
(yet) where to write them down.
> I somehow forgot about the 0.3.7
> release. To push this forward I just commit so
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 10:56:38 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:14:18 +0100, Julian Bäume wrote:
> > Hi,
> > while being busy working on the kde4 port,
> Where do we do the brainstorming? I have a few ideas, but don't know
> (yet) where to write them down.
We should do it mainly in
Since I'm almost broke and stressed out, I've been spending all my time
hacking on ktechlab... I just spent most of the morning figuring out how
to better to link pin currents to nodal currents...
Here's a bad pattern I came across in Component:
#
void Component::setNo
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Julian Bäume wrote:
> Hi,
> while being busy working on the kde4 port, I somehow forgot about the 0.3.7
> release. To push this forward I just commit some changes to the about-box. I
> didn't put any e-mail data into it, because I wasn't sure which addresses to
> us
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:06:15 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is any minor thing to correct :)
>
> I was testing this revision on i586 ppc and x86_64. svn rev.237 failed
> to build on gcc 4.4
>
Rev 237 from the 'trunk' tree, right?
The code that will be released is locate
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:41 PM, P Zoltan wrote:
> The code that will be released is located in branches/ktechlab-0.3.7/ ,
> momentanly having rev.235. Please check if that tree has this issue.
Hello,
it suffers the same build failure with rev235.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskI
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 21:53:38 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:41 PM, P Zoltan wrote:
> > The code that will be released is located in branches/ktechlab-0.3.7/ ,
> > momentanly having rev.235. Please check if that tree has this issue.
>
> Hello,
> it suffers the same build
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:53:38 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:41 PM, P Zoltan wrote:
>> The code that will be released is located in branches/ktechlab-0.3.7/ ,
>> momentanly having rev.235. Please check if that tree has this issue.
>
> Hello,
> it suffers the same buil
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Julian Bäume wrote:
> I think, this is a missing header file. Could you try r238 from the
> ktechlab-0.3.7 branch?
>
This r238 went further. But however ktechlab sources are not
compatible with gpsim 0.23.0 and thus the build failed again:
https://koji.fedoraproj
I'm a little lost. Where is Julian's KDE4 port base?
--GC
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 5:35:20 pm P Zoltan wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:53:38 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH
>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:41 PM, P Zoltan wrote:
> >> The code that will be released is located in branches/ktech
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 23:31:11 Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Julian Bäume wrote:
> > I think, this is a missing header file. Could you try r238 from the
> > ktechlab-0.3.7 branch?
>
> This r238 went further. But however ktechlab sources are not
> compatible with gp
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 23:56:30 Glen Canaday wrote:
> I'm a little lost. Where is Julian's KDE4 port base?
This is far from being finished... and not in svn, yet. I setup a wiki page,
where I put some information about how to get the sources and play around with
it. Don't expect anything usef
14 matches
Mail list logo
