2008/7/25, julien kroczek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
This is what i get when I drag and drop a component on a empty circuit :
[?1034h(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
It's on a suse 11.0 64 bits with kde 3 or 4
Thanks a lot!
Could you please also tell the
I'll try to make the SVN version work this weekend; my current problem is
that I have not enough free space on my HDD to build ktechlab :o
2009/5/13 Alan Grimes agri...@speakeasy.net
I looked up the way to pull old versions from SVN and I reverted some
files, fixed a few bugs and now need to
2009/8/9 Alan Grimes agri...@speakeasy.net
P Zoltan wrote:
here is a patch that makes ktechlab to use Eigen for calculations, so
the internal matrix implementation can be removed.
=)
Known problems:
- the caching and changed/unchanged flags probabily don't work as they
should
If the code works well, send a patch and we could included in the official
tree.
Too bad I have only a laptop, which has only usb ports, so I can't test the
parallel ports.
2009/9/15 santiago gonzalez santig...@gmail.com
Ok... found the parallel port inputs (status) error.. the setHigh()
Yes. the logic update is done as you've written.
What do you mean by unstable? Ktechlab crashes or just outputs garbage?
Also I don't understand how to reproduce the problem. Set the logic update
timer to 5e6 and then?
Maybe Alan knows: how is the time in simulation managed? We should provide
Where is Jason when we need him? There are quite a few things to do
on the sourceforge project. (1)
Also I haven't heard about Lawrence Shafer for a while. If we want to
upload some content to ktechlab.org, we should contact him. (2)
More text inline follows:
2009/10/10, Juan De Vincenzo
2009/10/10, santiago gonzalez santig...@gmail.com:
Why not doing a relase from ktl-0.3.7?
Releasing something on sourceforge needs some rights. Currenly nobody
active on the list has them, as far as I know.
It works good enought for me, just need to fix the flowcode (changing 1 line
in
:
On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 18:57 +0200, Zoltan Padrah wrote:
Where is Jason when we need him? There are quite a few things to do
on the sourceforge project. (1)
OK Guys, I'm still listening. I'm just busy with other aspects of my
life (don't ask!).
What do you need me to do?
J
Done, I guess. If still doesn't work, I'll search for other settings...
2009/11/17 Julian Bäume jul...@svg4all.de
moin,
I just tried to edit a page in the wiki and I get the following error:
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
The action you have
Sounds good.
Just a note about the voltage/current visualization: considering the fact
that the rectangles displaying the voltages will be redrawn many times per
second, we should consider there the drawing performance. Maybe a simple
class showing only that rectangle could be useful.
The topic in the subject should be also discussed. I've never worked yet
with either one, but SVN has some shortcomings -- for example is hard to
track code changes.
Compatibility with KDE could be a bonus.
Julian worked with git on kde4 port.
Note, comments, opinions?
Hi,
here are some diagrams about how I imagine the kde4 port's document should
work like:
http://sourceforge.net/userapps/trac/zoltan_padrah/wiki/KtechlabDocumentProposed
The sources, dia files, are also there.
About the interface part I'm not very sure, these are just first stretches.
I want
2010/2/23 Julian Bäume jul...@svg4all.de
On Saturday 20 February 2010 20:49:11 P Zoltan wrote:
The next thing i wanted to do is to merge the testing code in the kde4
port tree. I have to learn more abot git to know how to do it; if anyone
wants to do this, I'd happily copy the merged
2010/3/26 Julian Bäume jul...@svg4all.de
My question is how should be the Simulator class implemented? It's good
enough a singleton as it was? The problem becomes tricky when we consider
the plugin structure... Or should we use come class from ktechlatform?
For now, I would like to
2010/7/18 Julian Bäume jul...@svg4all.de
hi,
I just pushed some cmake code into a cmake_magic branch. Can you test it
and
tell me, if it still compiles for you and you are able to load our plugins?
It
works okay for me.
Tested with GUI tools (see tutorial on wiki:
Hello,
There is more fun with kdevplatform:
The following code:
KDevelop::IDocumentFactory * fact =
m_core-documentController()-factory(application/x-circuit);
qDebug() factory = fact ;
KUrl emptyDoc( i18n(Untitled) );
KDevelop::IDocument *mydoc = fact-create( emptyDoc, m_core);
Hi,
2010/7/18 Alan Grimes agri...@speakeasy.net
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
I think ppl are going a bit crazy with plugins. =\
The basic circuit elements should be built-in, if anything.
For the end user, it won't matter if the running code resides
Replying to myself:
if an untitled, empty document is created, then it has the mimetype
application/octet-stream; if it doesn't have extension, it will be
text/plain, and only if it has the .circuit extension, then it will be
recognized as a circuit.
So, as a workaround, in the test case a new,
Hello,
In the current implementation, the template shouldn't be instantiated
directly. For an example, see the basic_ec plugin:
http://ktechlab.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ktechlab/ktl-zoltan_p;a=commitdiff;h=f4e1cb1cbcd0f802183fe44a52df970c9a75
The
Change committed to GIT:
http://ktechlab.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ktechlab/ktl-zoltan_p;a=commit;h=e7bfb95c62b747f49b510ec8f215f31d6f166283
Note that also I've merged my repository's master branch with yours. This
caused some conflicts, so please review the previous commit, too.
Hi,
I merged your master and tested it. It crashes, when starting with a session
containing opened files. This is, because the simulatormanager isn’t
initialized. So in main.cpp the manager needs to be initialized before the
core. (i. e. 3 lines above) This could cause trouble in the future,
2010/9/3 Alan Grimes agri...@speakeasy.net:
Original Message
To: alonz...@users.sourceforge.net
From: old_ti...@users.sourceforge.net
Subject: KTechLab
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:47:55 +
Is anyone still working on this very important program. It
is very good and needs
2010/10/11 gg aka linedubeth linedub...@free.fr:
thanks for your reply but
i have copy the file in
http://gitorious.org/kdevelop/kdevelop/blobs/master/app/Messages.sh
it's reponse
kubuntu...@kubuntudev:~/ktechlab$ sudo ./Messages.sh
./src/ktechlabflowcodeui.rc: 1: Syntax error: newline
Hi,
After analyzing the source code of the old simulator, I've come to
the conclusion that currently the best way to abstract the simulator,
is to use the following abstraction:
- the cicuit elements should be added as the existing Component subclasses
- the Circuit itself could be extended
Thanks for the answers.
After thinking more about this, I came to the conclusion that a
generic controller for all the components should be enough, so I'll go
with the second option, based on associated property objects. This way
a generic controller should be enough for all the components, and
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Lanzendörfer david.lanzendoer...@o2s.ch
Date: 2010/10/31
Subject: Re: KTechLab for KDE4
To: Zoltan Padrah zoltan.pad...@gmail.com
Hi
I tried to compile
leviat...@dizzy-6 ~/ktl-j_ohny_b/build $ git branch
* master
On my gentoo machine
Hi,
I was lately thinking about how to properly support buses in
ktechlab. First I'd like to make a short review of the existing
infrastructure:
Elements are ideal models;
they have Pins;
Wires connect two Pins;
Components consist of one or more elements and pins.
Essentially a bus should be
2010/11/14 Alan Grimes agri...@speakeasy.net:
Opnions, comments?
One of the key deficiencies of the old code is that components could not
have bus input and outputs. So with something like a RAM or ALU or
something you would have to place a bus splitter immediately adjacent to
the part to
Hi,
2010/11/22 Julian Bäume jul...@svg4all.de:
moin,
I somehow dislike the idea of having translatable strings in the simulation
code. AFAICS this is for now needed for the model parameters implemented for
each component. I’d like to move that out of the Component-code. I‘m fine with
having
Happy new year for everybody on the mailing list!
In this email I'd like to summarize what happened with the project in
2010 and lay out the plans for 2011.
The main goal for 2010 was to release a port of ktechlab on Qt4/KDE4. I
think this is still the main goal. The progress is slow,
I think we need to do some bug-hunting on the 0.3.7 version.
Bonus: there is also a feature-request in the tracker app (adjustable
voltage drop on the LED; that is relatively easy to do).
--- Forwarded message ---
From: SourceForge.net nore...@sourceforge.net
To:
Hello everybody,
Lately I've spend some time on my minimal-simulator branch. This branch is
supposed to contain only the simulator engine of ktechlab. It also
contains the code interfacing with microcontroller development tools
(sdcc, gpasm, gpsim, ...).
After the commits made today, it
Hello,
After recent discussion on IRC, I'd like to propose the following plan
for integrating the simulation core (minimal_simulator branch in my
repository) and the rest of the code.
In the minimal_simulator branch test-cases should be defined, just as
the GUI would use the simulator core.
Hello everybody,
there has been only a little activity on the mailing list, but this
doesn't mean that development stopped. Currently I'm working on the
minimal simulator codebase, which consists only of classes directly
related to simulation, and not user interface.
In the current
Hello everybody,
in this email I'd like to summarize the current situation in the
development.
In my previous email to the list, I've started discussing the circuit,
component and connector deletion problems. Now there is progress, as a
deleted circuit will free all the references
, then this is a nontrivial task, because the minimal
simulator branch has only the first commit common with the GUI code. is
there a possibility to rebase the whole minimal simulator to the master,
and then merge it?
Thank you for reading all this,
Zoltan
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 23:09:47 +0100, Zoltan
Hello,
in this email I'm summarizing the discussions on IRC, related to ktechlab.
( #ktechlab on freenode.net)
The topics discussed were the following:
- kdevplatform API stability
- merging the simulator and master branches
- asking about possible cooperation with the Caneda project
I'm
Hello,
after some experimentation with git, I've found an easy way to merge the
2 branches.
1. move everything from the minimal_branch simulator to a new directory
2. commit the move: git commit -A
3. check out master: git checkout master
4. merge minimal_branch to the master: git merge
2011/4/4 Julian Bäume jul...@svg4all.de:
Next item: merging the simulator and the master branches
It is useful to have all the codebase in the same tree, so it can be more
easily managed. Merging is not that trivial, as the source code for the
simulator has been re-imported to my simulator
On Domingo 03 Abril 2011 17:14:09 Zoltan Padrah escribió:
Hello,
in this email I'm summarizing the discussions on IRC, related to ktechlab.
( #ktechlab on freenode.net)
The topics discussed were the following:
- kdevplatform API stability
- merging the simulator and master branches
- asking
Hello,
since the last update on the components, the following improvements
have been made:
- ground search seems to work well;
- current source works;
- inductor and
- capacitor seem to pass basic tests
- porting of the diode (ECDiode) has been started.
It seems that the diode is broken. It
Hi,
2011/5/7 Slavko slav...@slavino.sk:
Ahoj,
Dňa Sat, 7 May 2011 21:37:33 +0200 Zoltan Padrah
zoltan.pad...@gmail.com napísal:
Hello,
since the last update on the components, the following improvements
have been made:
thanks for report.
Please, can you please write small report
Update on the EcDiode component:
2011/5/7 Zoltan Padrah zoltan.pad...@gmail.com:
- porting of the diode (ECDiode) has been started.
It seems that the diode is broken. It shows very strange values. I
guess I will try to compare it to the last versions that worked...
The porting is done. I've
2011/5/8 Alan Grimes agri...@speakeasy.net:
Zoltan Padrah wrote:
Yeah, that's been problematic for a long time. I strongly suggest you
beg/borrow/steal/even buy a copy of Circuit Simulation by Farid N. Najm.
The simulator in ktechlab tries to be a quick hackjob to work on a
Pentium 2
If they manage to keep the site running, and attract users, then it is
nice. We will see how it will work out. I've registered.
2011/5/13 Alan Grimes agri...@speakeasy.net:
I was sent this through my sourceforge account. I hate forums, but I
felt obliged to pass this to the list.
2011/5/17 Julian Bäume jul...@svg4all.de:
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 20:23:17 Zoltan Padrah wrote:
If they manage to keep the site running, and attract users, then it is
nice. We will see how it will work out. I've registered.
just did so, too. Do we want to link it on the sf.net project page
Hello,
I'd like to start discussion about a few changes to the sourceforge
project settings:
- webpage: should it point to ktechlab.org, or just to the wiki:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/ktechlab/index.php?title=Main_Page
On the wiki is some useful information about the state of
On Thu, 19 May 2011 21:59:34 +0200, Julian Bäume jul...@svg4all.de wrote:
moin,
yesterday we decided to try out github to host our sources. This will
make it
more easy for new contributors to fork the project and get their changes
upstream. You can find the sources at
Hi,
in theory the latest git version (in my private repo on sourceforge,
or the one at github [1]) should fix this issues. It should compile,
and have the possibility to open and show circuits. For me the
component won't appear, probably because of some bug that needs to be
fixed.
Test results
could see if there is some notable progress.
As usual, any feedback is welcome.
Zoltan
2011/5/17 Zoltan Padrah zoltan.pad...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I'd like to start discussion about a few changes to the sourceforge
project settings:
- webpage: should it point to ktechlab.org, or just
/6/1 Zoltan Padrah zoltan.pad...@gmail.com:
Hello,
The email about the sourceforge project changes has been sent two
weeks ago, so based on the feedback, I conclude that the changes are
acceptable. I'm planning to implement the changes in a few days.
Also I propose the idea of having
Change applied, please test:
http://ktechlab.sourceforge.net
http://ktechlab.sf.net
http://www.ktechlab.sourceforge.net
Best regards,
Zoltan
2011/6/4 Julian Bäume jul...@svg4all.de:
Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2011, 22:49:02 schrieb Zoltan Padrah:
Technical details: it seems that the mechanism
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:52:27 +0200, Julian Bäume jul...@svg4all.de wrote:
moin,
Am Dienstag, 7. Juni 2011, 16:47:08 schrieb Zoltan Padrah:
I've applied some more changes and tested it with two systems: one
with kdevplatform-dev installed, one without. Looks good for me. If it
needs more
/hosted.php?secure=0amp;1306493484;
media=all /
Cheers,
Drew.
From: Zoltan Padrah zoltan.pad...@gmail.com
To: ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011, 17:06
Subject: Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Better information on sourceforge about
Hello everybody,
I just updated the ktechlab wiki by adding introductory text to the main
page and a link to a new status page about the project.
Main page here:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/ktechlab/index.php?title=Main_Page
Status page here:
Hi everybody,
some people might know that Julian and I have attended the Desktop
Summit 2011 event in Berlin, Germany. On the summit we have had
discussions and also did a short ktechlab hacking sessions.
I'm sending my notes from the discussion below, in order to keep
everybody up-to-date.
Hi,
finally I have some time to work on KTechLab, so I've started checking
the todo items from desktop summit.
One of the item is to check how would be possible to store /
synchronize the wiki on sourceforge with the source tree. For this,
I've found an interesting-looking tool, called pandoc.
, Slavko slav...@slavino.sk wrote:
hi,
Dňa Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:41:43 +0100 Zoltan Padrah
zoltan.pad...@gmail.com napísal:
the readme file for ktechlab source tree is mostly completed:
http://ktechlab.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ktechlab/ktl-zoltan_p;a=blob;f=README;hb=HEAD
https
Hi all,
recently several bugs have been reported to the version 0.3.7 of
KTechLab, some of which should be easy to fix. I'm thinking that in
the middle of January, when I will have time for it, to try to
incorporate the fixes for the reported stuff into a new version,
0.3.8, just for maintenance
Hi,
recently I was working on the integration of the simulator library
into the existing GUI. While checking the code, I found that we need a
way to notify the simulator about changes in the visualized circuit.
Currently there is a signal in IDocumentModel, but i can't find the
code that
Hi,
here is a project, that offers collaborative circuit editing:
http://upverter.com/
It's similar to github.
At some point we should add some plugin to be compatible with the service above.
Best regards,
Zoltan
Hi kyto,
if the microcontroller support has been compiled in (check the
configure script's output / log), then in the component list there
should be a PIC device. If it doesn't appear, then probably some
dependency is missing, probably gpsim or glibc.
In this moment I don't have the ktechlab
Hello everybody,
here is another interesting-looking project:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/circuit/
It is a logic circuit simulator. I didn't try it yet, but it looks nice.
Unfortunately it is written in Java, so it will be hard to do code
sharing with that project, but at least we will be
2012/4/4 Nagy László bigla...@startolj.hu:
Hello,
http://sourceforge.net/projects/simulide/?source=directory
Hi,
this project looks very very similar to Qt3 ktechlab. We should
definitely contact the developers of this project.
Best regards,
Zoltan
Regards
Hi,
I see a lot of potential in the simulation of small networked devices,
like wireless sensor nodes or internet-of-things type of devices. Such
devices are built around microcontrollers like PIC, AVR or ARM-based
stuff. It's just a matter of hooking up the electronic simulator to
the given
Dear all,
I've just finished writing a guide for easy setup for development of
ktechlab. The guide is currently in a branch, waiting for review and
merging. Link:
https://github.com/ktechlab/ktechlab/tree/development-documentation
Pull request:
https://github.com/ktechlab/ktechlab/pull/6
Hi,
the retirement of hosted apps is offical.
For long term I propose to migrate the content of the hosted mediawiki
into the source tree as documentation, and to github's wiki service as
supporting material.
My point against the migration to project web is that the
applications running in
]: ***
[src/kdevplugins/ktlproject/CMakeFiles/ktlproject.dir/ktlprojectmanager.o]
Error 1
make[1]: *** [src/kdevplugins/ktlproject/CMakeFiles/ktlproject.dir/all]
Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
atg@tortoise ~/source/ktechlab/build $
###
Zoltan Padrah wrote:
I can't see
/ktlproject.dir/ktlprojectmanager.o]
Error 1
make[1]: *** [src/kdevplugins/ktlproject/CMakeFiles/ktlproject.dir/all]
Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
atg@tortoise ~/source/ktechlab/ktechlab $ ls -l
Zoltan Padrah wrote:
Hi,
I've just pushed a few commits into the 'kdevplatform-1.3' branch on github
on sourceforge.
Best regards,
Zoltan
2012/7/10 Zoltan Padrah zoltan.pad...@gmail.com:
Hi,
the retirement of hosted apps is offical.
For long term I propose to migrate the content of the hosted mediawiki
into the source tree as documentation, and to github's wiki service as
supporting material
Hi,
content from sourceforge has been copied to github's wiki:
https://github.com/ktechlab/ktechlab/wiki
The following content has been copied:
- mediawiki:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/ktechlab/index.php?title=Main_Page
- backup of old mediawiki
- my notes from a private trac
Hi,
I have cloned the svn repository of ktechlab from sourceforge and
pushed it to github.
This way the 0.3.6 series can be maintained a little more until the
0.4 release is done.
Is everybody OK with copying the old source tree in a new git
repository in ktechlab organization?
Comments,
ktechlab-0.3.8, based on ktechlab-0.3.7. If it will worth the effort,
maybe a maintenance release of 0.3.7 could be released.
Best regards,
Zoltan
2012/8/28 Zoltan Padrah zoltan.pad...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have cloned the svn repository of ktechlab from sourceforge and
pushed it to github.
This way
- 10 September: 9 - 15h, UTC+1
- 17 September onwards: 17h - 24h, UTC+1
2012/8/31 Alan Grimes agri...@speakeasy.net:
Zoltan Padrah wrote:
Hi,
because no replies have arrived to me about the SVN import, I've
forked the SVN import from my user on github to the ktechlab
organization. Link
usable functionality
- what to do to have something working
- sourceforge project: upgrade to Allura
- future development procedure
Best regards,
Zoltan
2012/9/3 Zoltan Padrah zoltan.pad...@gmail.com:
Hi,
it's a good idea to have a discussion about the current situation and
plans
Hi,
I've sent a few pull requests on github to ktechlab's repository:
https://github.com/ktechlab/ktechlab/pulls
Anybody interested in the changes feel free to comment on them, or
discuss them on the mailing list.
In case you are planning to review the changes in a few days, then
please signal
Hello,
probably you already know that sourceforge is working on retiring
hosted apps [1], [2]. Currently we are using mediawiki from hosted
apps as the project's main website [3].
As a migration option in a previous email I mentioned that the content
of mediawiki could be copied to ktechlab's
Hi,
this feature of Github is very useful for quickly writing documentation.
Zoltan
https://github.com/blog/1395-relative-links-in-markup-files
Relative links in markup files
via The GitHub Blog by ymendel on 1/30/13
We show rendered markup in several places on GitHub, most notably
Hello,
apparently all the Sourceforge projects will be upgraded soon to the new
platform, including KTechlab. I will look into the migration, and try to
perform it before the automatic migration.
See The blog entry from SF.net:
Hello,
The KTechLab project is under the process of being upgraded to Allura, un
SourceForge. See upgrade description and status here:
https://sourceforge.net/p/upgrade/?search=ktechlab
Zoltan Padrah 2013. április 23., kedd napon a következőt írta:
Hello,
apparently all the Sourceforge
Hello,
I'm sending an after-upgrade summary for the project, because the code
repositories' location has changed, and I'm not sure if everybody has got
the upgrade notification emails. All the changes listed here have been
automatically performed by SF.net at the upgrade.
KTechLab has been
to sourceforge.
Note about the mediawiki header: I've added a MediaWiki:Sitenotice page.
Best regards,
Zoli
Zoltan Padrah 2012. augusztus 22., szerda napon a következőt írta:
Hi,
because no other proposals for wiki location have been done, I'm
starting to copy the contents
regards,
Zoli
Zoltan Padrah 2012. augusztus 22., szerda napon a következőt írta:
Hi,
finally I have more free time.
Questions related to this error:
- which repository / branch are you trying to build
(output of git rev-parse HEAD and git status would be really nice)
- which linux
- sourceforge project: upgrade to Allura
- this is done; any problems found by anybody?
- future development procedure
- needs discussion
Best regards,
Zoli
2012/9/3 Zoltan Padrah zoltan.pad...@gmail.com
Replying to myself, because I sent the previous unfinished email by
mistake
Hi Alan,
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 19:24:42 +0300, Alan Grimes alonz...@verizon.net
wrote:
Thanks, zoltan, for putting effort into this.
I've attached a compile error. I tried to just cmake then make. First I
tried multi-threaded make ( -j 6 ), this was from a single-threaded
attempt.
just
Hi,
here is the proposed fix for the (common?) problem of getting the text
representation of circuits in KTechLab:
https://github.com/ktechlab/ktechlab/pull/22
In Git, the branch of the fix is called fix-circuit-opening-v2.
If opening circuits still doesn't work after applying the fix,
Hello,
apparently the KDE people are working on making KDE 5 libraries more
reusable:
http://dot.kde.org/2013/09/25/frameworks-5
Best regards,
Zoli
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can
Hello,
for plotting signals in KTechLab, in the future, maybe SciDAVis or LabPlot
2 could be used. I guess they work investigating. Please find details at
the links below:
http://dot.kde.org/2009/10/16/labplot-and-scidavis-collaborate-future-free-scientific-plotting
Hi,
I've updated the documentation on the current design of KTechLab. It is
written in doxygen, and currently it can be found in the 'add-devel-doc-v2'
branch on Github.
The most relevant new documentation is an object diagram, in SVG format.
Here is a link to it:
-a and it basically outputted an epic poem about
why git should never be used for anything, ever.
Zoltan Padrah wrote:
Hi,
I've updated the documentation on the current design of KTechLab. It
is written in doxygen, and currently it can be found in the
'add-devel-doc-v2' branch on Github
Hello,
in case you are not following the KDE development: the next major version,
5, is planned to be modular and easier to reuse. Also hopefully it will be
less bloated.
Here is an interesting blog post about the dependencies of various KDE 5
modules:
Hi,
I've written a guide on how to run KTechLab in a chroot environment:
https://github.com/ktechlab/ktechlab/wiki/testing-in-chroots-for-multiple-distributions
This was part of my efforts to support the latest distributions, and
I've documented the setup procedure. Probably I will come handy
on freenode.net.
Have fun,
Zoli
2013-08-09 22:20 GMT+03:00 Zoltan Padrah zoltan.pad...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I'm sending another update on this thread, because a lot of time has passed
since my last email.
A preliminary agenda:
- status
- kde4 port, based on kdevplatform
- basically
Hi,
I'd like to clarify the situation: currently there is not usable
version of ktechlab, and unfortunately I cannot dedicate time and
energy to the project in a consistent manner, so I cannot guarantee
when there will be a released version. I want to get it up and running
on modern systems, but
Hi,
I'm sending this email to possibly avoid debugging effort duplication
by others, and to document my findings about crashes.
# 1. crashes when the mouse pointer moves over an item on the circuit:
This looks like some invalid assignmenet / reinterpretation of pointer
to me. A
Hi,
before actually starting to fill the code with smart pointers, I want
to start a discussion about it.
As I remember, Alan used to say that he doesn't like smart pointers,
because they show that the code that uses them is not well thought-out
(feel free to correct me...).
My current
Hi,
as anybody can see, the port of ktechlab from kde3 to kde4 is taking
way to much time. This is because rewriting a software usually takes
much more time than fixing a buggy/limited/... exiting one. Apparently
I had to learn this lesson the hard way.
As a conclusion, I started porting the
Hi,
I've pushed a new development branch to github, to the ktechlab-0.3 repository:
https://github.com/ktechlab/ktechlab-0.3/tree/port-0.3.8-kde4-v1
This new branch compiles and shows a main window. It is not useful,
because practically it crashes on any user activity. However, the code
is
Hi,
in my opinion the topic of KTechLab becoming a KDE project is relevant
again, so I'm resending the last email on this topic.
Best regads,
Zoltan
Zoltan Padrah zoltan.pad...@gmail.com ezt írta (2014. július 8., kedd):
Hi,
for the better of the KTechLab project, I'm proposing
Hi,
as I'm preparing the next release, I've started thinking about the version
number it should have. I'm thinking about 0.3.8, or 0.3.40. The first one
is the next release after 0.3.7, released on 2009 november, while the
0.3.40 is a big version of 0.3 series, involving a 4 as it depends on
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
