[kubernetes-users] Re: SIG Architecture

2017-06-22 Thread pmorie
+1 to this - I have wanted this to be a thing at many times while working on service-catalog. On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 4:12:48 PM UTC-4, Brian Grant wrote: > > At the leadership summit a few weeks ago, I believe there was consensus > that we should start an Architecture SIG. There were

[kubernetes-users] Re: SIG Architecture

2017-06-22 Thread 'Vishnu Kannan' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q
+1 On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 1:49 PM, 'Eric Tune' via Kubernetes developer/contributor discussion wrote: > +1. > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Andy Goldstein wrote: > >> +1 from me too >> >> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Clayton Coleman

Re: [kubernetes-users] How to access a service through a https?

2017-06-22 Thread 'Ahmet Alp Balkan' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q
I wrote an answer to this at https://stackoverflow.com/ questions/44708272/how-to-access-a-kubernetes-service- through-https/44709245#44709245. If you are actually planning to expose an application running on Kubernetes to the outside world with HTTPs, you should consider buying HTTPs

[kubernetes-users] Re: SIG Architecture

2017-06-22 Thread 'Eric Tune' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q
+1. On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Andy Goldstein wrote: > +1 from me too > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Clayton Coleman > wrote: > >> +1 - there have been several sig discussions recently about having a more >> streamlined way to seek consensus

[kubernetes-users] Re: SIG Architecture

2017-06-22 Thread Andy Goldstein
+1 from me too On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Clayton Coleman wrote: > +1 - there have been several sig discussions recently about having a more > streamlined way to seek consensus on broad reaching technical changes, and > this seems like a natural (possibly overdue)

[kubernetes-users] Re: SIG Architecture

2017-06-22 Thread Clayton Coleman
+1 - there have been several sig discussions recently about having a more streamlined way to seek consensus on broad reaching technical changes, and this seems like a natural (possibly overdue) sig. On Jun 22, 2017, at 3:13 PM, 'Brian Grant' via Kubernetes developer/contributor discussion

[kubernetes-users] Re: SIG Architecture

2017-06-22 Thread Ihor Dvoretskyi
Big +1 from me. It's long-awaited and we definitely need a place to discuss architecture questions and make architecture decisions. On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:12 PM 'Brian Grant' via Kubernetes developer/contributor discussion wrote: > At the leadership summit a

[kubernetes-users] SIG Architecture

2017-06-22 Thread 'Brian Grant' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q
At the leadership summit a few weeks ago, I believe there was consensus that we should start an Architecture SIG. There were also discussions of Working Groups around extensibility and repo refactoring, but I'd like to fold that into SIG Architecture, since they are all related, and because I've

[kubernetes-users] How to access a service through a https?

2017-06-22 Thread isazzad79
This is my cluster info -- kubectl cluster-info Kubernetes master is running at https://129.146.10.66:6443 Heapster is running at https://129.146.10.66:6443/api/v1/proxy/namespaces/kube-system/services/heapster KubeDNS is running at

[kubernetes-users] Re: Information Sharing; Distributed Computing

2017-06-22 Thread Warren Strange
DNS is used for service name lookup, but there is no shared memory between pods. On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 9:57:52 AM UTC-6, Tobias Rahloff wrote: > > Can sb point me towards sources that explain how information sharing in > k8s works? Especially in a academic, distributed computing

[kubernetes-users] Information Sharing; Distributed Computing

2017-06-22 Thread Tobias Rahloff
Can sb point me towards sources that explain how information sharing in k8s works? Especially in a academic, distributed computing sense. If I understand correctly, Pods/Clusters use DNS to distribute traffic between dynamically scaled containers and have some kind of shared memory? Kind Regards

Re: [kubernetes-users] Getting Google's Cloud SQL Proxy to work

2017-06-22 Thread Evan Jones
The Cloud SQL Proxy logs suggest to me that it may not be using the right credentials? It is possible that it is trying to use the cluster's "default service account"? If you use "kubectl exec ... -ti /bin/sh" you should be able to examine the contents of the credentials file that is being

Re: [kubernetes-users] Getting Google's Cloud SQL Proxy to work

2017-06-22 Thread Traiano Welcome
Hi Evan On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Evan Jones wrote: > I know nothing about wordpress, but for what it is worth, we are using > this Cloud SQL Proxy container with success. A few notes about the config > you posted: > > > * I'm assuming that where you have >

Re: [kubernetes-users] Close access to node services

2017-06-22 Thread Rodrigo Campos
On different cloud providers, there is probably something to do. On AWS just don't open those ports in the security group, and you are safe. Also, you can avoid nodes having a public IP, for example. But where are you running? On Thursday, June 22, 2017, Evg wrote: > Thank

Re: [kubernetes-users] Use minikube in windows subsystem for linux?

2017-06-22 Thread dsanders
Hmmm, I didn't think about it that way. Good point. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kubernetes user discussion and Q" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [kubernetes-users] Getting Google's Cloud SQL Proxy to work

2017-06-22 Thread Traiano Welcome
Hi Ahmet On Thursday, 22 June 2017 02:25:05 UTC+4, Ahmet Alp Balkan wrote: > > Can you run "kubectl logs -l app=wordpress"? I am assuming there will be > some logs from the crashing mysql container. > > Thanks for your response. I get no output from running that command (I suppose no logs are