[kubernetes-users] Re: CLuster Federation for multi-cloud service deployment

2017-06-23 Thread Quinton Hoole
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:01 AM, 'Jonathan MacMillan' via kubernetes-sig-federation wrote: > [+kubernetes-sig-federation] > > On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 6:07:02 PM UTC-7, kelka...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> We have been researching on Cluster Federation to built a management >> platform for

Re: [kubernetes-users] GKE tags and routes on nodes

2017-06-23 Thread paul . tinsley
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 8:05:43 PM UTC-5, Brandon Philips wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:00 AM Romain Vrignaud wrote: > > We have currently two points that are hard for us to manage : >   - we need to add some additional tags in our clusters nodes in order to > manage firewalling r

[kubernetes-users] Re: SIG Architecture

2017-06-23 Thread
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 5:36 AM, DL duglin wrote: > Overall, big +1 > > > But the SIG would not get involved with issues specific to a particular > component or functional area, which would be the purview of some other SIG, > except where they deviate from project-wide principles/conventions. > >

[kubernetes-users] Re: Introducing Smith - a tool managing a dependency graph of Kubernetes objects

2017-06-23 Thread DL duglin
Maybe a demo during one of the Thursday community calls? -Doug > On Jun 23, 2017, at 2:17 AM, Mikhail Mazurskiy > wrote: > > > Hello there, > I'd like to introduce a project I've been working on for almost a year now. > It's called Smith [1]. > It's a tool to provision a graph of Kubernetes o

[kubernetes-users] Re: SIG Architecture

2017-06-23 Thread DL duglin
Overall, big +1 > But the SIG would not get involved with issues specific to a particular component or functional area, which would be the purview of some other SIG, except where they deviate from project-wide principles/conventions. I'd like some discussion around this as SIG-Arch is establish

[kubernetes-users] Re: SIG Architecture

2017-06-23 Thread Jamie Hannaford
+1 Can we emphasise in the mission statement that the SIG is concerned with the architecture of the Kubernetes project and codebase(s)? Before I read it I assumed it was about how to architect apps *on* Kubernetes. I'm sure other folks might make that assumption too. On Thursday, 22 June 2017

[kubernetes-users] Re: SIG Architecture

2017-06-23 Thread Michail Kargakis
+1 On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:12 PM, 'Brian Grant' via Kubernetes developer/contributor discussion wrote: > At the leadership summit a few weeks ago, I believe there was consensus > that we should start an Architecture SIG. There were also discussions of > Working Groups around extensibility and

[kubernetes-users] Re: SIG Architecture

2017-06-23 Thread Joris van der Kwast
+1 Op donderdag 22 juni 2017 22:12:48 UTC+2 schreef Brian Grant: > > At the leadership summit a few weeks ago, I believe there was consensus > that we should start an Architecture SIG. There were also discussions of > Working Groups around extensibility and repo refactoring, but I'd like to > f

[kubernetes-users] Grafana and heapster don't work after kubernetes upgrade

2017-06-23 Thread giorgio . cerruti
Hi there, I made an issue on github because after Kubernetes update on GKE Grafana and heapsters stopped to work. At this link (https://github.com/kubernetes/heapster/issues/1696) you could find a formatted output of logs. I hope somebody can help me with this issue. Thank a lot -- You receiv

[kubernetes-users] Where the node capabilities are stored in kubernetes

2017-06-23 Thread Rajendra Kharat
My questions related to kubernetes resource management: 1. How Kubernetes master collects all his nodes resource capabilities and then use those capabilities to schedule Pods as per there requirement and resource availability?. 2. Where the capabilities retrived fr