Re: [kubernetes-users] Re: Low throughput on K8s LoadBalancer

I mean, the LB itself requires very little CPU, but certainly hardware can make a difference... On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Vinoth Narasimhan wrote: > Thanks tim. > > Is my assumption is right ? > > Throughput depends on CPU threads and sockets arch > > On Friday,

[kubernetes-users] Re: Is a pod equivalent to a set of containers with shared IPC, net, PID namespaces and volumes?

在 2016年10月5日星期三 UTC+8上午10:41:17，Anthony Alba写道： > Aside from the orchestration, is a pod equivalent to a set of containers with > shared IPC, net, PID, and volumes? > > > I.e when Kubernetes creates a pod is it doing, behind the scenes, the > equivalent of  > > > docker run --name first app1

Re: [kubernetes-users] Re: Low throughput on K8s LoadBalancer

Thanks for following up! On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Vinoth Narasimhan wrote: > Finally the issue was with the hardware spec. The previous k8s test i did > with 3 node cluster with each node spec has 1cpu and 4Gig RAM. > > Today i map the spec of the native tomcat

Re: [kubernetes-users] Re: Low throughput on K8s LoadBalancer

Thanks tim. Is my assumption is right ? Throughput depends on CPU threads and sockets arch On Friday, September 22, 2017 at 12:39:41 PM UTC+5:30, Tim Hockin wrote: > > Thanks for following up! > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Vinoth Narasimhan > wrote: > > Finally

Re: [kubernetes-users] Resolv.conf override for a pod

I am trying to mount that volume but my container won't start. I guess I am doing something wrong. This is the yaml apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: {{ template "fullname" . }} namespace: code labels: chart: "{{ .Chart.Name }}-{{ .Chart.Version | replace

Re: [kubernetes-users] steps to migrate Docker image to use kubernetes

Yes, exactly the same as in the las post, right? Have you read mine and Tom recommendations? Please do On Friday, September 22, 2017, Shashank Dutt Jha wrote: > Following is what I use in docker-compose and it works > volumes: > -

Re: [kubernetes-users] Is a pod equivalent to a set of containers with shared IPC, net, PID namespaces and volumes?

At least ir has changed, you won't see pids from other containers in the pod (although I think is the idea in some future, when containers runtimes allow it) On Friday, September 22, 2017, wrote: > 在 2016年10月5日星期三 UTC+8上午10:41:17，Anthony Alba写道： > > Aside from the

Re: [kubernetes-users] Is a pod equivalent to a set of containers with shared IPC, net, PID namespaces and volumes?

Shared PID is coming, but last I checked it was not finished. On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Rodrigo Campos wrote: > At least ir has changed, you won't see pids from other containers in the pod > (although I think is the idea in some future, when containers runtimes allow

Re: [kubernetes-users] Resolv.conf override for a pod

you're trying to mount a directory (emptyDir) onto a file (/etc/resolv.conf). Without seeing the error that is a wild guess. I can't stop you from doing this, but I strongly encourage you to re-read and internalize what I wrote about multiple nameserver records. On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 6:19 AM,

Re: [kubernetes-users] Is a pod equivalent to a set of containers with shared IPC, net, PID namespaces and volumes?

FYI, the proposal for enabling shared PID namespace is undergoing some changes to be more configurable (and to ensure backward compatibility). Proposal: ​​https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/1048 On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:06 AM, 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q