[Bug 1988819] Re: When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should list them separately

2024-04-02 Thread David Kalnischkies
Not sure who all the upstream(s) involved might be, but from my personal PoV at least you can add all the options you likeā€¦ the topic gets harder if we talk defaults & changing (e.g.) the lists completely (like that tabular verbose-explosion thingy from apk or whatever it was). At some point it

[Bug 1988819] Re: When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should list them separately

2024-04-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Geekley I personally agree and would go a lot further and hide even most dependencies (you don't really care which libraries you are installing, just about choices made, e.g. if there's an a | b dependency it should tell you that it picked a). So if you want to think about it that terse mode

[Bug 1988819] Re: When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should list them separately

2024-04-02 Thread Geekley
In the proposed fix, will there be some sort of flag and/or configuration for apt and apt-get to let me NOT see this list of "deferred due to phasing" packages? I agree it's important to list them for users who want to see it, but it's also important to not bloat the output with a bunch of extra

[Bug 2036597] Re: Strange permissions and/or links to default directories in home folder (Music, Pictures, Public, Templates and Videos))

2024-04-02 Thread Mateusz Stachowski
Good news this bug has been resolved. https://github.com/ubuntu/gnome-sdk/issues/188 The fix is currently in the candidate channel of gnome-42-2204 content snap. I can confirm from my own testing it indeed fixes this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of