Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 22.08.2014 um 18:25 schrieb Jonathan Riddell:
Rex from Fedora says he has no problems with GCC 4.9.
Fedora doesn't use FSF GCC, but the redhat branch. Please state the branch
and the revision used.
It would appear the fedora builds used gcc svn revision 214009
Hi everyone
One of our community member got Project Neon running on his ARM board.
In order to aid his work we have now enabled armhf packages on the
Kubuntu Next and Kubuntu Next staging PPA's.
Cheers
Rohan Garg
--
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or
hola,
(another tldr mail \o/)
the last couple of days I have been looking into jenkins while staging
a first proof of concept using the existing neon5 tech. I'd like to
see if anyone has thoughts on whether or not we should use jenkins.
I personally am yet undecided because as a matter of fact
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Rohan Garg rohang...@kubuntu.org wrote:
Hi everyone
One of our community member got Project Neon running on his ARM board.
In order to aid his work we have now enabled armhf packages on the
Kubuntu Next and Kubuntu Next staging PPA's.
Do we intend to go
Do we intend to go anywhere production wise with this or is it just
playing around with arm?
It's mostly intended for people who have access to ARM boards and are
interested in making Plasma 5 work on it. Since I do not have access
to such boards, I'll probably only end up making sure things
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Rohan Garg rohang...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Feel free to air any concerns you might have over here.
I still think there should be a formal bug report for the foundations
team to investigate why we are not using CFQ by default anyway.
At any rate +1 to not having shit
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Harald Sitter apachelog...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
hola,
(another tldr mail \o/)
the last couple of days I have been looking into jenkins while staging
a first proof of concept using the existing neon5 tech. I'd like to
see if anyone has thoughts on whether or
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote:
Actually, maybe it could be interesting if you could just host the machines
doing the tasks but extend the build.kde.org instance so the information
could be shown together with each project.
Or maybe it doesn't make sense,
On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 18:49:24 Harald Sitter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Rohan Garg rohang...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Feel free to air any concerns you might have over here.
I still think there should be a formal bug report for the foundations
team to investigate why we are
