On 14 October 2014 12:24, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:54:54PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> Given that essentially lowest priority is requested under CFQ,
>> equivalent result should be possible to achieve with cgroups
>> containment.
>> Specifically by limiting CPU
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:54:54PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Given that essentially lowest priority is requested under CFQ,
> equivalent result should be possible to achieve with cgroups
> containment.
> Specifically by limiting CPU (cpu.shares set to 100 ~= 1/10 of the
> default 1024) an