We have also been looking at Elisa and Babe but I don't believe a final
decision was made. Amarok is still Qt4 though.
On Mar 9, 2018 07:52, "Mark Fraser" wrote:
> Now that Amarok 2.9 has finally been released
> https://amarok.kde.org/en/node/888 is it worth sticking
Now that Amarok 2.9 has finally been released
https://amarok.kde.org/en/node/888 is it worth sticking with this rather
than moving over to Cantata for the LTS release?
--
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
Hi,
I checked i386 iso again, with virtualbox on different laptops and virtual
machine on PVE (set to single core kvm32, that might be the closest
environment to real i386 machine).
Here are some results:
- The noisy screen problem only happened on the virtualbox on my laptop.
PVE, and
Odd^2, I got it this time.
But a few hours ago I did see only one option (Normal) in the F4 menu.
There must be something wrong in the iso IMO...
2018-03-09 17:17 GMT+08:00 Rik Mills :
> Odd, as it's certainly there in a VM.
>
> https://i.imgur.com/2xkNoNH.png
>
> On
Odd, as it's certainly there in a VM.
https://i.imgur.com/2xkNoNH.png
On 09/03/18 08:56, Franklin Weng wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Valorie Zimmerman 於 2018年03月09日 14:15 寫道:
>> Hi all, I completed the i386 tests I could complete, and filed bugs
>> about the problems I encountered. Of course all these
Hi,
Valorie Zimmerman 於 2018年03月09日 14:15 寫道:
> Hi all, I completed the i386 tests I could complete, and filed bugs
> about the problems I encountered. Of course all these tests were done
> on 64-bit machine, so I don't know if they are worthwhile at all.
>
> We need tests on 32-bit software.
>