Re: Amarok

2018-03-09 Thread Aaron Honeycutt
We have also been looking at Elisa and Babe but I don't believe a final decision was made. Amarok is still Qt4 though. On Mar 9, 2018 07:52, "Mark Fraser" wrote: > Now that Amarok 2.9 has finally been released > https://amarok.kde.org/en/node/888 is it worth sticking

Amarok

2018-03-09 Thread Mark Fraser
Now that Amarok 2.9 has finally been released https://amarok.kde.org/en/node/888 is it worth sticking with this rather than moving over to Cantata for the LTS release? -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: i386 ISO tests

2018-03-09 Thread Franklin Weng
Hi, I checked i386 iso again, with virtualbox on different laptops and virtual machine on PVE (set to single core kvm32, that might be the closest environment to real i386 machine). Here are some results: - The noisy screen problem only happened on the virtualbox on my laptop. PVE, and

Re: i386 ISO tests

2018-03-09 Thread Franklin Weng
Odd^2, I got it this time. But a few hours ago I did see only one option (Normal) in the F4 menu. There must be something wrong in the iso IMO... 2018-03-09 17:17 GMT+08:00 Rik Mills : > Odd, as it's certainly there in a VM. > > https://i.imgur.com/2xkNoNH.png > > On

Re: i386 ISO tests

2018-03-09 Thread Rik Mills
Odd, as it's certainly there in a VM. https://i.imgur.com/2xkNoNH.png On 09/03/18 08:56, Franklin Weng wrote: > Hi, > > > Valorie Zimmerman 於 2018年03月09日 14:15 寫道: >> Hi all, I completed the i386 tests I could complete, and filed bugs >> about the problems I encountered. Of course all these

Re: i386 ISO tests

2018-03-09 Thread Franklin Weng
Hi, Valorie Zimmerman 於 2018年03月09日 14:15 寫道: > Hi all, I completed the i386 tests I could complete, and filed bugs > about the problems I encountered. Of course all these tests were done > on 64-bit machine, so I don't know if they are worthwhile at all. > > We need tests on 32-bit software. >