Re: Memory usage with qemu-kvm-0.12.1.1

2009-12-31 Thread Rik van Riel
On 12/31/2009 12:02 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Daniel Bareiro wrote: What tests would be recommendable to make to reproduce the problem? Oh, I thought you were the one seeing the problem! If you cannot easily reproduce it, then please don't spend too long over it. I've nev

Re: Memory usage with qemu-kvm-0.12.1.1

2009-12-31 Thread Hugh Dickins
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > > What tests would be recommendable to make to reproduce the problem? Oh, I thought you were the one seeing the problem! If you cannot easily reproduce it, then please don't spend too long over it. I've never noticed it myself (perhaps because my wor

OpenSolaris 64-bit possible regression

2009-12-31 Thread Mark Bidewell
I have been testing OpenSolaris using the latest qemu-kvm and the KVM modules shipped with the latest F-12 kernel. When I attempt to load OpenSolaris 2009.06 live CD in 64-bit mode I get several complaints about illegal instruction followed by an infinite loop of attempts to enter maintenance mode

Re: Memory usage with qemu-kvm-0.12.1.1

2009-12-31 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi, Hugh. On Wednesday, 30 December 2009 18:14:30 +, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Sun, 27 Dec 2009, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On 12/27/2009 12:12 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > On 12/27/2009 06:45 PM, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > > > > > > If so, it doesn't copy sta...@kernel.org. Is it queued for -st

About the e1000 ethernet emulation code, a little confuse.

2009-12-31 Thread Liang YANG
Hello, when we configure the VM network using tap device, the actual send and receive function is realized by writev and read system call. Is that right? But when I look into the E1000 ehternet emulation code, the start send function is start_xmit -> process_tx_desc->xmit_seg -> qemu_send_packet->q

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu/qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2 - migration still very slow

2009-12-31 Thread Pierre Riteau
On 31 déc. 2009, at 00:14, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > Hi, > few months ago Pierre Riteau reported regression of exec migration in qemu. > (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-08/msg01557.html) > There was some discussion, but there is no clear conclusion. > Today, I tried qemu-kvm-0.12.

Re: [Autotest] [Autotest PATCH] KVM test: No need close session when login timeout

2009-12-31 Thread Michael Goldish
- "Yolkfull Chow" wrote: > On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:07:58AM -0500, Michael Goldish wrote: > > > > - "Amos Kong" wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 08:28:18AM -0500, Michael Goldish wrote: > > > > > > > > - "Amos Kong" wrote: > > > > > > > > > If login timeout, wait_for(

Re: [AUTOTEST PATCH 2/2] KVM-test: Move two 'remote_login' out of try block in kvm_vm.py

2009-12-31 Thread Michael Goldish
- "Yolkfull Chow" wrote: > If vm.remote_login failed 'session.close()' can result in exception > in finally clause. This patch fix the problem. > > Signed-off-by: Yolkfull Chow > --- > client/tests/kvm/kvm_vm.py | 51 > +-- > 1 files changed, 25 i

Re: [Autotest] [AUTOTEST PATCH 1/2] KVM-test: Fix a bug that about list slice in scan_results.py

2009-12-31 Thread Michael Goldish
GOOD/FAIL/ERROR lines are always preceded by START lines, and info_list is appended a "" when parsing a START line, so it seems unreasonable for info_list to be empty when parsing a GOOD/FAIL/ERROR line. What file did you parse when you got that exception? Can you reproduce the problem and show me

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Lazy fpu, cr0.ts

2009-12-31 Thread Sheng Yang
On Thursday 31 December 2009 00:25:37 Avi Kivity wrote: > There are currently some inefficiencies in how we virtualize the fpu and > cr0: > > - we trap changes to cr0.ts unconditionally; however, when the guest fpu > is loaded, we're not really interested in cr0.ts (it's only needed when > th