Bugs item #2525768, was opened at 2009-01-21 16:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by danv
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2525768group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
2010/11/27 Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/27 Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
Hi,
This patch series is a
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/27 Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/27 Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:06
One question I have about Kemari is whether it adds new constraints to
the QEMU codebase? Fault tolerance seems like a cross-cutting concern
- everyone writing device emulation or core QEMU code may need to be
aware of new constraints. For example, you are not allowed to
release I/O
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/27 Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/27 Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:06
2010/11/27 Blue Swirl blauwir...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/27 Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/27 Blue Swirl
2010/11/27 Paul Brook p...@codesourcery.com:
One question I have about Kemari is whether it adds new constraints to
the QEMU codebase? Fault tolerance seems like a cross-cutting concern
- everyone writing device emulation or core QEMU code may need to be
aware of new constraints. For
2010/11/27 Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/27 Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/27 Blue Swirl
blkio may help you.
http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt
2010/11/26 Henry Pepper henryp...@gmail.com:
Hi
I'm running some tests on a KVM setup, based on RHEL 6 beta2.
When running a disk test in one guest, then no other guests seems to
get any disk I/O
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:03:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:19:07PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:31:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
I am using open firmware naming scheme
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:41:10AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:03:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:19:07PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:31:41PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:43:47PM
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 06:22:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:41:10AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:03:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
BEV should be easy. When you register BEV found on pci card you search
for device path to that pci
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:49:39AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 06:22:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:41:10AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:03:11PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
BEV should be easy. When you
Hi,
can anyone explain this code in assigned_dev_pci_read_config?
...
/* vga specific, remove later */
if (address == 0xFC)
goto do_log;
fd = pci_dev-real_device.config_fd;
again:
ret = pread(fd, val, len, address);
if (ret != len) {
...
}
do_log:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 07:06:19PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:49:39AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 06:22:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Yeah. I looked at the Seabios code. The simplest would be to change
device path to point to rom
get_command_status_output() - cmd_status_output()
get_command_output() - cmd_output()
get_command_status() - cmd_status()
Signed-off-by: Michael Goldish mgold...@redhat.com
---
client/tests/kvm/kvm_subprocess.py | 27 +--
client/tests/kvm/kvm_test_utils.py
On the KSM overcommit test, read_until_last_line_matches
is used, and now this function can raise an expect error.
Trap it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com
---
client/tests/kvm/tests/ksm_overcommit.py | 25 ++---
1 files changed, 14
PEP 8 states that class names should use the CapWords convention.
kvm_spawn - Spawn
kvm_tail - Tail
kvm_expect - Expect
kvm_shell_session - ShellSession
This is an RFC because I wonder if the proposed names are too
general, even though they are usually prefixed by
'kvm_subprocess.'.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:47:26PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 07:06:19PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:49:39AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 06:22:16PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Yeah. I looked at the Seabios code.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:47:26PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
I don't think seabios should try to parse the path. Instead, I think
seabios should build a name for each device it finds using the same
algorithm that qemu uses
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 01:40:12PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:47:26PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
I don't think seabios should try to parse the path. Instead, I think
seabios should build a name
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not gotten around to
review it?
IOW, last call if you have
Trimming CC list, adding seabios list.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:04:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 01:40:12PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Qemu does not know that Seabios needs optionrom to boot from a
Hi list,
Being that the virtio interfaces are stated as acheiving 5-8 Gb
throughput now with vhost, as opposed to 1Gb without, how should their
link speed be defined when the choices are 2500M or 1M?
I have them plotted out to make a 10Gb bond out of a pair, counting on
5Gb max each, which
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:07:45PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
Trimming CC list, adding seabios list.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:04:24PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 01:40:12PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 08:15:42PM +0200, Gleb Natapov
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
Anthony, Blue
No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not
26 matches
Mail list logo
