Side note: While testing nVMX, I was hitting a libvirt bug, and filed this one:
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961665 -- [virsh]
Attempt to force destroy a guest fails due to 'unknown' reason, leaves
a defunct qemu process
which I was told is possibly a Kernel/KVM bug.
Any
On 11 May 2013 01:36, Christoffer Dall cd...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
That all being said, we can remove the check. I don't think, however,
that it being an unlikely thing is a good argument: if we remove the
check we need to make sure that the VM does whatever the architecture
dictates, which
On 11 May 2013 01:38, Christoffer Dall cd...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:36:52PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Here's what the documentation says:
quote
4.77 KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT
Capability: basic
Architectures: arm, arm64
Type: vcpu ioctl
Parameters: struct struct
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 01:36:30AM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:33:03PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:28:00PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 02/05/13 17:09, Catalin Marinas wrote:
BTW, on arch/arm it looks like this is used when you
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:14 PM
To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
tiejun.c...@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Add userspace debug stub
Am 11.05.2013 um 12:24 schrieb Bhushan Bharat-R65777 r65...@freescale.com:
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:14 PM
To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
Hello:
Has anyone been able to limit traffic separately to individual VMs?
I just figured out libvirt has bandwidth controls in the guest machine's
configuration. I tried it and it worked. Looking at the qdisc ls report,
it apparently uses tc to achieve the limiting so I am not sure why my
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 11 May 2013 01:38, Christoffer Dall cd...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:36:52PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Here's what the documentation says:
quote
4.77 KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT
Capability: basic
On 11 May 2013 17:26, Christoffer Dall cd...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
I just think that saying EINVAL: Invalid argument for a perfectly
valid argument which is just not supported on this hardware is what's
wrong, I think ENXIO or ENODEV or whatever is more appropriate of
this.
That's fine with
This sounds similar to what Kemari was looking to achieve:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/FaultTolerance
But unfortunately, I believe Kemari development has halted.
-Original Message-
From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
Valentin Zagura
Sent:
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:14 PM
To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
tiejun.c...@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Add userspace debug stub
11 matches
Mail list logo
