On 05/25/2013 12:45 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 04:06:57PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 05/20/2013 10:06:46 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
>>> index 8465c2a..da6bf61 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/p
On 05/25/2013 04:34 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 03:55:53AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> Zap at lease 10 pages before releasing mmu-lock to reduce the overload
>> caused by requiring lock
>>
>> After the patch, kvm_zap_obsolete_pages can forward progress anyway,
>> so upd
Hi Marcelo,
On 05/25/2013 04:23 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> +static void kvm_zap_obsolete_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> +struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, *node;
>> +LIST_HEAD(invalid_list);
>> +
>> +restart:
>> +list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(sp, node,
>> + &kvm->arch.active_mm
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 08:29 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Patch e03b449cbddf (kvm tools: add status notification hook for
>> virtio) converted virtio-net to use a new notification mechanism,
>> but unfortunately left virtio-mmio behind.
>>
>> The direct
On 05/21/2013 08:29 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Patch e03b449cbddf (kvm tools: add status notification hook for
> virtio) converted virtio-net to use a new notification mechanism,
> but unfortunately left virtio-mmio behind.
>
> The direct consequence is that both arm and arm64 guests are left
> wit
I seem to have mis-sent v3. Trying again with same patches after
fixing the message id for the cover letter. I hope the duplicates
that are thus created don't inconvenience people too much.
If they do, I apologize.
I have pared down the Cc list to reduce the noise.
sched maintainers are Cc'd on al
apic->pending_events processing has a race that may cause INIT and SIPI
processing to be reordered:
vpu0:vcpu1:
set INIT
test_and_clear_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT)
process INIT
set INIT
set SIPI
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:23:07PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Hi Xiao,
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 03:55:52AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > The current kvm_mmu_zap_all is really slow - it is holding mmu-lock to
> > walk and zap all shadow pages one by one, also it need to zap all guest
> >
