On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:40:44AM +0200, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:04:42PM +0200, Razya Ladelsky wrote:
Hi,
Thank you all for your comments.
I'm sorry for taking this long to reply, I was
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:40:44AM +0200, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:04:42PM +0200, Razya Ladelsky wrote:
Hi,
Thank
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:36:30PM +0200, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:40:44AM +0200, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec
Am 19.12.2013 um 08:02 schrieb Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 11.11.2013, at 15:02, Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Don't try to compute
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:36:30PM +0200, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:40:44AM +0200, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 18,
In contrast to VMX, SVM dose not automatically transfer DR6 into the
VCPU's arch.dr6. So if we face a DR6 read, we must consult a new vendor
hook to obtain the current value.
Fixes a regression of 020df0794f.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
---
Should go to stable as well.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:56:10PM +0200, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:36:30PM +0200, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:56:10PM +0200, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:36:30PM +0200, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:19:47PM +0200, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:56:10PM +0200, Abel Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19,
It is possible for __direct_map to be called on invalid root_hpa
(-1), two examples:
1) try_async_pf - can_do_async_pf
- vmx_interrupt_allowed - nested_vmx_vmexit
2) vmx_handle_exit - vmx_interrupt_allowed - nested_vmx_vmexit
Then to load_vmcs12_host_state and kvm_mmu_reset_context.
Check
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 17:07 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:34:46PM +, Kim Phillips wrote:
VFIO supports pass-through of devices to user space - for sake
of illustration, say a PCI e1000 device:
- the e1000 is first unbound from the PCI e1000 driver via
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 17:03 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:34:54PM +, Kim Phillips wrote:
Platform drivers such as the vfio-platform meta- driver [1]
should be allowed to specify that they can bind to any device,
much like PCI drivers can with PCI_ANY_ID.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:22:11PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 17:07 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:34:46PM +, Kim Phillips wrote:
VFIO supports pass-through of devices to user space - for sake
of illustration, say a PCI e1000 device:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:29:21PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 17:03 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:34:54PM +, Kim Phillips wrote:
Platform drivers such as the vfio-platform meta- driver [1]
should be allowed to specify that they can
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 2:34 PM
To: Wood Scott-B07421
Cc: Kim Phillips; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
Bhushan Bharat-R65777; Yoder Stuart-B08248;
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:06:21PM +, Stuart Yoder wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 2:34 PM
To: Wood Scott-B07421
Cc: Kim Phillips; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 13:43 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:06:21PM +, Stuart Yoder wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 2:34 PM
To: Wood Scott-B07421
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 12:44 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:29:21PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 17:03 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:34:54PM +, Kim Phillips wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 04:15:03PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 13:43 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:06:21PM +, Stuart Yoder wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 4:32 PM
To: Wood Scott-B07421
Cc: Yoder Stuart-B08248; Kim Phillips; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
kvm@vger.kernel.org; Bhushan Bharat-R65777;
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:08:55PM +, Stuart Yoder wrote:
How will it know not to grab the device? The knowledge of whether
the
binding was explicitly requested or not does not get passed through to
the probe function.
Nor should it, as a driver should not know, nor care about
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
Am 19.12.2013 um 08:02 schrieb Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 11.11.2013, at 15:02, Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
Am 20.12.2013 um 05:37 schrieb Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
Am 19.12.2013 um 08:02 schrieb Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 11.11.2013, at 15:02, Aneesh Kumar K.V
23 matches
Mail list logo
