Here rcu_assign_pointer() is ensuring that the
initialization of a structure is carried out before storing a pointer
to that structure.
So, rcu_assign_pointer(p, NULL) can always safely be converted to
RCU_INIT_POINTER(p, NULL).
Signed-off-by: Monam Agarwal monamagarwal...@gmail.com
---
Il 21/03/2014 19:34, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
+ if (irqe.trig_mode == IOAPIC_EDGE_TRIG)
+ ioapic-irr = ~(1 irq);
+
Now, every call to ioapic_service() for an edge interrupt clears the IRR
bit immediately (assuming the mask is unset).
If the IRR bit is immediately zero on
Il 21/03/2014 20:09, H. Peter Anvin ha scritto:
Calling this a bug in the PMU code is ridiculous. If KVM tells the
system it os a specific vendor-family-model-stepping but diverges in
behavior then it, by definition, is broken.
Yeah, this is true. On AMD there is processor support for
Il 22/03/2014 03:29, Christoffer Dall ha scritto:
1. Simply mandate that VM implementations support persistent variables
for their UEFI implementation - with whatever constraints that may
put on higher level tools.
2. Require that OSes shipped as part of compliant VM images make no
Dear Recipients,
As per http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Bugs, I am seeking advice regarding where
to file the following bug:
I think that the current RHEL/Centos-Version of KVM
(qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.6.x86_64) on Centos 6.5 does make it
substantially more difficult to install a Windows
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:04:32PM -0700, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Peter Wu pe...@lekensteyn.nl wrote:
[skip]
When -cpu host is used, qemu/kvm passed the host CPUID F/M/S to the
guest. intel_pmu_cpu_*() - intel_pmu_lbr_reset() uses rdmsr() /
wrmsr(), rather
On Saturday 22 March 2014 10:50:45 Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:04:32PM -0700, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Peter Wu pe...@lekensteyn.nl wrote:
[skip]
When -cpu host is used, qemu/kvm passed the host CPUID F/M/S to the
guest.
On 2014-03-20 21:58, Bandan Das wrote:
Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com writes:
On 2014-03-20 04:28, Bandan Das wrote:
Some L1 hypervisors such as Xen seem to be calling invept after
vmclear or before vmptrld on L2. In this case, proceed with
falling through and syncing roots as a case
Thanks Paolo. What's the user space tool / command to trigger the
virtio_balloon functionality? Basically I am looking for the whole code
patch that triggers the virtio_balloon.
Thanks,
-Kai
On 2014年03月21日 16:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/03/2014 05:22, Kai Huang ha scritto:
Hi,
I see the
Just see the reply. Thanks a lot!
Thanks,
-Kai
On 2014年03月21日 17:03, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:22:54PM +0800, Kai Huang wrote:
Hi,
I see the virtio-balloon is designed for memory auto balloon between
KVM host and guest, but from latest linux kernel mainline code,
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:29:50 -0700, Christoffer Dall
christoffer.d...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:24:18PM +0800, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014 12:04:50 +, Robie Basak robie.ba...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:44:57PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek
Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de writes:
On 2014-03-20 21:58, Bandan Das wrote:
Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com writes:
On 2014-03-20 04:28, Bandan Das wrote:
Some L1 hypervisors such as Xen seem to be calling invept after
vmclear or before vmptrld on L2. In this case, proceed with
falling
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 08:07:42AM +, Prof. Dr. Michael Schefczyk wrote:
Dear Recipients,
As per http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Bugs, I am seeking advice
regarding where to file the following bug:
If you're experiencing it on CentOS
http://bugs.centos.org/
If you're experiencing it
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:05:03AM +0100, Peter Wu wrote:
On Saturday 22 March 2014 10:50:45 Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:04:32PM -0700, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Peter Wu pe...@lekensteyn.nl wrote:
[skip]
When -cpu host is used,
Il 22/03/2014 13:23, Grant Likely ha scritto:
VM implementations SHOULD to implement persistent variables for
their UEFI implementation - with whatever constraints that may be put on
higher level tools. Variable storage SHALL be a property of a VM
instance, but SHALL NOT be stored as part of a
Using _safe has it's own issues if noone checks the errors.
On March 22, 2014 5:27:59 AM PDT, Gleb Natapov g...@kernel.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:05:03AM +0100, Peter Wu wrote:
On Saturday 22 March 2014 10:50:45 Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:04:32PM -0700, Venkatesh
On Saturday 22 March 2014 14:27:59 Gleb Natapov wrote:
but now I have a NULL dereference (in rapl_pmu_init). Previously, when
`-cpu SandyBridge` was passed to qemu, it would show this:
[0.016995] Performance Events: unsupported p6 CPU model 42 no PMU
driver, software events
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:57:58 +0100, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 22/03/2014 13:23, Grant Likely ha scritto:
VM implementations SHOULD to implement persistent variables for
their UEFI implementation - with whatever constraints that may be put on
higher level tools. Variable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/22/2014 03:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 22/03/2014 13:23, Grant Likely ha scritto:
VM implementations SHOULD to implement persistent variables for
their UEFI implementation - with whatever constraints that may be
put on higher level
On 03/23/14 00:38, Michael Casadevall wrote:
On 03/22/2014 03:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 22/03/2014 13:23, Grant Likely ha scritto:
VM implementations SHOULD to implement persistent variables for
their UEFI implementation - with whatever constraints that may be
put on higher level tools.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 09:08:37AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 22/03/2014 03:29, Christoffer Dall ha scritto:
1. Simply mandate that VM implementations support persistent variables
for their UEFI implementation - with whatever constraints that may
put on higher level tools.
2.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:23:54PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:29:50 -0700, Christoffer Dall
christoffer.d...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:24:18PM +0800, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 6 Mar 2014 12:04:50 +, Robie Basak
robie.ba...@canonical.com
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 08:19:52PM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 09:08:37AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 22/03/2014 03:29, Christoffer Dall ha scritto:
1. Simply mandate that VM implementations support persistent variables
for their UEFI implementation - with
23 matches
Mail list logo
