We should avoid to set irqfd{} unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen tiejun.c...@intel.com
---
kvm-all.c | 18 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
index 18cc6b4..5b9786b 100644
--- a/kvm-all.c
+++ b/kvm-all.c
@@ -1257,21
On 26 December 2014 at 08:05, Tiejun Chen tiejun.c...@intel.com wrote:
We should avoid to set irqfd{} unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen tiejun.c...@intel.com
Is there a hot path that we use this on such that the difference
in code order matters at all?
thanks
-- PMM
--
To
On 26/12/14 13:00, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 26 December 2014 at 08:05, Tiejun Chen tiejun.c...@intel.com wrote:
We should avoid to set irqfd{} unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen tiejun.c...@intel.com
Is there a hot path that we use this on such that the difference
in code order
On 26 December 2014 at 10:16, Denis V. Lunev den-li...@parallels.com wrote:
IMHO the patch does not change anything even on hot-hot path.
the declaration 'struct kvm_irqfd irqfd = {};' will
result in memset inside.
Thus in order to achieve declared goal author should
declare
struct
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90381
Bug ID: 90381
Summary: error when loading kvm_intel module
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version: 3.18.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90381
--- Comment #1 from Bhasker C V bhas...@unixindia.com ---
The machine (also can be found in the crash attachment) is
Dell D620 with processor features as below:
processor: 1
vendor_id: GenuineIntel
cpu family: 6
model: 15
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90381
--- Comment #2 from Bhasker C V bhas...@unixindia.com ---
The 3.14.x stock kernel (of debian) works fine but 3.17.x also does the same
crash. I do nott have any other kernel revisions inbetween to iterate.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90381
Bhasker C V bhas...@unixindia.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|error when loading |error when loading
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90381
--- Comment #3 from Bhasker C V bhas...@unixindia.com ---
Managed to load the kvm_intel without a crash. This crash seems to happen
_only_ if nested=1 is given in the options.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee
