On Wednesday 23 December 2009 07:51:29 am Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 12/22/2009 10:01 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
new e1000 driver is more superior in architecture and do the required
work to make the new e1000 driver a full replacement
On Wednesday 23 December 2009 02:31:11 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/23/2009 03:07 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
That is a very different situation from the AlacrityVM patches, which:
- Are a pure software concept and any compatibility mismatch is
self-inflicted. The patches
AlacrityVM
drivers have much cleaner design / internal architecture than some of their
competitors..
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz bzoln...@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: remove superfluous NULL pointer check in
kvm_inject_pit_timer_irqs()
This takes care of the following entries from Dan's list:
arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c +714 kvm_inject_pit_timer_irqs(6) warning: variable
derefenced
