On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:53 AM, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
Hi Kumar/Benh,
After further looking into the code I think that if we correct the vector
range below in DebugDebug handler then we do not need the change I provided
in this patch.
Here is the snapshot for 32 bit (head_booke.h,
On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:53 AM, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
Hi Kumar/Benh,
After further looking into the code I think that if we correct the vector
range below in DebugDebug handler then we do not need the change I provided
in this patch.
Here is the snapshot for 32 bit (head_booke.h,
On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Stuart Yoder wrote:
From: Stuart Yoder stuart.yo...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder stuart.yo...@freescale.com
---
-removed KVM prefix to patch subject, patch is not KVM specific
arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_hcalls.S |2 ++
On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Stuart Yoder wrote:
From: Stuart Yoder stuart.yo...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder stuart.yo...@freescale.com
---
-removed KVM prefix to patch subject, patch is not KVM specific
arch/powerpc/kernel/epapr_hcalls.S |2 ++
On Jul 9, 2012, at 7:58 AM, Varun Sethi wrote:
Merge the 32 bit cpu setup code for e500mc/e5500 and define the cpu_restore
routine (for e5500/e6500) only for the 64 bit case. The cpu_restore routine
is used in the 64 bit case for setting up the secondary cores.
Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi
On Jul 9, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Varun Sethi wrote:
For the 64 bit case separate out e5500 cpu_setup and cpu_restore functions.
The cpu_setup function (for the primary core) is passed the cpu_spec pointer,
which is not there in case of the cpu_restore function. Also, in our case
we will have to
On Jul 9, 2012, at 8:04 AM, Varun Sethi wrote:
Added CPU_FTR_EMB_HV feature check for e550.
Signed-off-by: Varun Sethi varun.se...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman mihai.cara...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_fsl_booke.S |6 ++
1 files changed, 6
On Feb 29, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Olivia Yin wrote:
From: Liu Yu yu@freescale.com
So that we can call it when improving SPE switch like book3e did for fp
switch.
Signed-off-by: Liu Yu yu@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Olivia Yin hong-hua@freescale.com
---
v2: add Signed-off-by
On Feb 29, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Olivia Yin wrote:
From: Liu Yu yu@freescale.com
So that we can call it when improving SPE switch like book3e did for fp
switch.
Signed-off-by: Liu Yu yu@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Olivia Yin hong-hua@freescale.com
---
v2: add Signed-off-by
, leaving e6500's CPU
table entry missing CPU_FTR_EMB_HV.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
---
Fixup patch for the KVM merge as requested by Marcelo.
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Kumar Gala ga
, leaving e6500's CPU
table entry missing CPU_FTR_EMB_HV.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
---
Fixup patch for the KVM merge as requested by Marcelo.
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Kumar Gala ga
On Mar 21, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 03/21/2012 01:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
From: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
DO_KVM will need to identify the particular exception type.
There is an existing set of arbitrary
On Mar 21, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 03/21/2012 01:04 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:09 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
From: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
DO_KVM will need to identify the particular exception type.
There is an existing set of arbitrary
--
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c|1 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c |5 +
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
[ Alex, let me know if you want this via my powerpc.git tree or your kvm tree ]
- k--
To unsubscribe from
files changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
[ Alex, let me know if you want this via my powerpc.git tree or your kvm tree ]
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a message to majord
On Aug 22, 2010, at 7:23 PM, Michael Neuling wrote:
Neither lfs nor stfs touch the fpscr, so remove the restore/save of it
around them.
Do some 32 bit processors need this?
In 32 bit before the merge, we use to have code that did:
#if defined(CONFIG_4xx) || defined(CONFIG_E500)
On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
[without]
debian-powerpc:~# time for i in {1..1000}; do /bin/echo hello /dev/null;
done
real0m14.659s
user0m8.967s
sys 0m5.688s
[with]
debian-powerpc:~# time for i in {1..1000}; do /bin/echo hello /dev/null;
done
On Jul 29, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
[without]
debian-powerpc:~# time for i in {1..1000}; do /bin/echo hello /dev/null;
done
real0m14.659s
user0m8.967s
sys 0m5.688s
[with]
debian-powerpc:~# time for i in {1..1000}; do /bin/echo hello /dev/null;
done
On Aug 19, 2008, at 5:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Christian Ehrhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dependent on the already existing CONFIG_KVM_GUEST config option
this patch
changes wrteei to wrtee allowing the hypervisor to rewrite those to
nontrapping
instructions. Maybe we should split
19 matches
Mail list logo
