On 09/06/15 16:52, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 12:47:12PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
Anything I can do to help move these along? It's a big performance
improvement for FreeBSD guests.
These patches are in Paolo's kvm-ppc-next branch and should go into
Linus' tree
On 09/06/15 16:52, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 12:47:12PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
Anything I can do to help move these along? It's a big performance
improvement for FreeBSD guests.
These patches are in Paolo's kvm-ppc-next branch and should go into
Linus' tree
Fantastic, thanks!
-Nathan
On 09/06/15 16:52, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 12:47:12PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
Anything I can do to help move these along? It's a big performance
improvement for FreeBSD guests.
These patches are in Paolo's kvm-ppc-next branch and should
Fantastic, thanks!
-Nathan
On 09/06/15 16:52, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 12:47:12PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
Anything I can do to help move these along? It's a big performance
improvement for FreeBSD guests.
These patches are in Paolo's kvm-ppc-next branch and should
Anything I can do to help move these along? It's a big performance
improvement for FreeBSD guests.
-Nathan
On 07/27/15 10:31, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
I've been running with these patches and a FreeBSD guest for a while
now and they work very well, providing big performance improvements
Anything I can do to help move these along? It's a big performance
improvement for FreeBSD guests.
-Nathan
On 07/27/15 10:31, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
I've been running with these patches and a FreeBSD guest for a while
now and they work very well, providing big performance improvements
I've been running with these patches and a FreeBSD guest for a while now
and they work very well, providing big performance improvements in tight
memory situations. Thanks! I did have to patch QEMU to enable the
hypercalls, however -- it might be worth adding them to the default set
since
I've been running with these patches and a FreeBSD guest for a while now
and they work very well, providing big performance improvements in tight
memory situations. Thanks! I did have to patch QEMU to enable the
hypercalls, however -- it might be worth adding them to the default set
since
On 02/18/15 15:33, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 02/18/15 14:00, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 09:34:54AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 18.02.2015 um 07:12 schrieb Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org:
It seems like KVM doesn't implement the H_CLEAR_REF and H_CLEAR_MOD
On 02/18/15 15:33, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 02/18/15 14:00, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 09:34:54AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 18.02.2015 um 07:12 schrieb Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org:
It seems like KVM doesn't implement the H_CLEAR_REF and H_CLEAR_MOD
On 02/18/15 14:00, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 09:34:54AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 18.02.2015 um 07:12 schrieb Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org:
It seems like KVM doesn't implement the H_CLEAR_REF and H_CLEAR_MOD hypervisor calls,
which are absolutely critical
On 02/18/15 14:00, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 09:34:54AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 18.02.2015 um 07:12 schrieb Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org:
It seems like KVM doesn't implement the H_CLEAR_REF and H_CLEAR_MOD hypervisor calls,
which are absolutely critical
It seems like KVM doesn't implement the H_CLEAR_REF and H_CLEAR_MOD
hypervisor calls, which are absolutely critical for memory management in
the FreeBSD kernel (and are marked mandatory in the PAPR manual). It
seems some patches have been contributed already in
13 matches
Mail list logo
