[Now without HTML email -- it's what you get for cc:ing me at work
instead of my upstream email :)]
2014-05-05 7:43 GMT-07:00 Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de:
On 05/05/2014 04:26 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 05/04/2014 07:21 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
2014-05-05 8:03 GMT-07:00 Aneesh Kumar K.V aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com:
Olof Johansson ol...@google.com writes:
2014-05-05 7:43 GMT-07:00 Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de:
On 05/05/2014 04:26 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 05/04/2014 07:21 PM, Aneesh
not a patch:
Acked-by: Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net
What's the plan on how to lock this in? Where's this document going to
live? In the kernel sources under Documentation/, or external?
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord
)
KVM/ARM Fixes for 3.12-rc2
Fixes compilation error with KVM/ARM enabled.
Olof Johansson (1):
ARM: kvm: rename cpu_reset to avoid name clash
arch/arm/kvm
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 01:14:57PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
Paolo,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 24/09/2013 21:49, Christoffer Dall ha scritto:
The following changes since
Hi Christoffer,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Christoffer Dall
christoffer.d...@linaro.org wrote:
On 16 September 2013 19:41, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Christoffer Dall
christoffer.d...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:39:26PM
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Christoffer Dall
christoffer.d...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:39:26PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
cpu_reset is already #defined in asm/proc-fns.h as processor.reset
cpu_reset is already #defined in asm/proc-fns.h as processor.reset,
so it expands here and causes problems.
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net
---
arch/arm/kvm/reset.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm/kvm
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
cpu_reset is already #defined in asm/proc-fns.h as processor.reset,
so it expands here and causes problems.
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net
I just noticed this is broken on 3.10 too, so if/when applying feel
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:35 AM, Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:40:31PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Thinking about the testability of this a bit more ... how much
effort would it be to get this code running on a 970MP with SLOF?
There should only be a few
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:35 AM, Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:40:31PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Thinking about the testability of this a bit more ... how much
effort would it be to get this code running on a 970MP with SLOF?
There should only be a few
Not sure which patch in the series this is needed for since I applied
them all, but I got:
CC arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.o
arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c:205: error: 'THIS_MODULE' undeclared here (not in a
function)
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
For some reason, I'm not seeing this build break, but the patch is
obviously correct.
Acked-by: Hollis Blanchard holl...@us.ibm.com
I saw it when building with pasemi_defconfig + manually enabled KVM
options (all available).
-Olof
--
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
For some reason, I'm not seeing this build break, but the patch is
obviously correct.
Acked-by: Hollis Blanchard holl...@us.ibm.com
I saw it when building with pasemi_defconfig + manually enabled KVM
options (all available).
-Olof
--
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:42:32PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 17:49 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
I'm completely open to naming suggenstions. The code is 100% ppc64
compatible. I'm not aware of any 970 specifics. I just thought all
PPC64 cores are called
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 06:01:26PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
The cache line sizes vary between processors, that is, the problem is
not only classic 32 32 bytes vs. classic 64 128 bytes, some CPUs
have 64 bytes cache line size for example too.
Which non-booke CPUs have 64
16 matches
Mail list logo
