On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:44:03PM +0100, Erik Rull wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've "only" a core2duo with VT, is it somehow possible to use the PCI
> device assignment without VT-d?
> That would be great because I cannot upgrade the Mainboard for my system.
>
> If yes, what other prerequisites must be
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:31:32PM -0600, Ryan C. Underwood wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:54:51PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 01/14/2010 05:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > >>Michael, I think 'DisINTx-' means the device is not PCI 2.3 compliant?
> > >No it doesn't, just th
lder versions of qemu/kvm.
>
> Just trying to see how this important feature can be used by people currently
> (which are using xen and kvm from their distros.)
>
> -nb
>
>
> --- On Fri, 1/1/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > From: Pasi Kärkkäinen
> >
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:55:34AM -0800, J Nb wrote:
> What would be a good storage topology for allowing for migration as well as
> support snapshots (for backup)
>
> Would love to hear recommendations as well as details on setup that people
> are using. (I am assuming that this is possible.)
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 06:33:35PM +0100, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 12/07/2009 07:15 PM, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:
>
> But the difference is that in case of Xen one can *easily* move the
> backends to small unprivileged VMs. In that case it doesn't matter the
>
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 10:40:00PM +0800, howard chen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I am comparing Xen and KVM to see which one is suitable for me usage.
>
>
> From the FAQ:
> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/FAQ#What_is_the_difference_between_kvm_and_Xen.3F
>
> It said:
>
> >> kvm does not support paravirt
