Hello all,
I have noticed that the virtio-net drivers for win2k exist in the 3
years' old:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/kvm/files/kvm-driver-disc/20081229/NETKVM-20081229.iso/download
but not in the newest:
On 03/07/12 09:04, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Reetedree...@shiftmail.org wrote:
On 03/06/12 13:59, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
BTW, I'll take the opportunity to say that 15.8 or 20.3 k IOPS are very low
figures compared to what I'd instinctively expect from a
On 03/06/12 13:59, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Martin Mailandmar...@tuxadero.com wrote:
Am 05.03.2012 17:35, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
1. Test on i7 Laptop with Cpu governor ondemand.
v0.14.1
bw=63492KB/s iops=15873
bw=63221KB/s iops=15805
v1.0
On 02/14/12 07:25, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 14.02.2012 05:42, Reeted wrote:
Hello, subject says it all
The driver for windows 2000 for the -vga std should be the Anapa VBE
Vesa VBEMP if I understand correctly
but I cannot on earth find this executable
http://navozhdeniye.narod.ru/vbemp.htm
On 10/05/11 01:12, Reeted wrote:
.
I found that virtual machines in my host booted 2x slower ... to the
vhost_net presence
...
Just a small update,
Firstly: I cannot reproduce any slowness after boot by doing:
# time /etc/init.d/chrony restart
Restarting time daemon: Starting /usr/sbin
Hello all,
for people in qemu-devel list, you might want to have a look at the
previous thread about this topic, at
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg61537.html
but I will try to recap here.
I found that virtual machines in my host booted 2x slower (on average
it's 2x slower, but probably
On 09/29/11 02:39, Chris Wright wrote:
Can you help narrow down what is happening during the additional 12
seconds in the guest? For example, does a quick simple boot to single
user mode happen at the same boot speed w/ and w/out vhost_net?
Not tried (would probably be too short to measure
On 09/28/11 09:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:10:21PM +0200, Reeted wrote:
I repost this, this time by also including the libvirt mailing list.
Info on my libvirt: it's the version in Ubuntu 11.04 Natty which is
0.8.8-1ubuntu6.5 . I didn't recompile this one, while
On 09/28/11 11:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:19:43AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
On 09/28/11 09:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This is my bash commandline:
/opt/qemu-kvm-0.14.1/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc-0.14 -enable-kvm
-m 2002 -smp 2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1 -name
On 09/28/11 11:53, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
YES!
It's the vhost. With vhost=on it takes about 12 seconds more time to boot.
...meaning? :-)
I've no idea. I was always under the impression that 'vhost=on' was
the 'make it go much faster
On 09/28/11 14:56, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:19:09PM +0200, Reeted wrote:
Ok that seems to work: it removes the vhost part in the virsh launch
hence cutting down 12secs of boot time.
If nobody comes out with an explanation of why, I will open another
thread
On 09/28/11 16:51, Reeted wrote:
On 09/28/11 14:56, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:19:09PM +0200, Reeted wrote:
Ok that seems to work: it removes the vhost part in the virsh launch
hence cutting down 12secs of boot time.
If nobody comes out with an explanation of why, I
I repost this, this time by also including the libvirt mailing list.
Info on my libvirt: it's the version in Ubuntu 11.04 Natty which is
0.8.8-1ubuntu6.5 . I didn't recompile this one, while Kernel and
qemu-kvm are vanilla and compiled by hand as described below.
My original message follows:
This is really strange.
I just installed a new host with kernel 3.0.3 and Qemu-KVM 0.14.1
compiled by me.
I have created the first VM.
This is on LVM, virtio etc... if I run it directly from bash console, it
boots in 8 seconds (it's a bare ubuntu with no graphics), while if I
boot it under
On 01/05/2011 02:08 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
My aim is that i want to create a HA-Cluster. For every service
(currently 3) i'd like to create a VM. I want to have two
hosts/nodes, both running SLES 11 SP1. I want to use DRBD to
replicate the File/LV to the passive node. Do you thing that's a
at infiniband speed?
That would be marvellous...
Thank you
Reeted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
16 matches
Mail list logo
