Thanks!
On 2014/10/24 23:19, Rick Jones wrote:
On 10/24/2014 12:41 AM, Zhangjie (HZ) wrote:
Hi,
I use netperf to test the performance of small tcp package, with TCP_NODELAY
set :
netperf -H 129.9.7.164 -l 100 -- -m 512 -D
Among the packages I got by tcpdump, there is not only small
Hi,
I use netperf to test the performance of small tcp package, with TCP_NODELAY
set :
netperf -H 129.9.7.164 -l 100 -- -m 512 -D
Among the packages I got by tcpdump, there is not only small packages, also
lost of
big ones (skb-len=65160).
IP 129.9.7.186.60840 129.9.7.164.34607: tcp 65160
Hi MST,
I see reduce networking latency
from Networking Todo, the idea is to allow handling short packets from softirq
or VCPU context.
If from softirq context, how could softirq copy skb to guest memory? If the
method is to use mmstruct of Qemu,
would it be expensive?
If from VCPU context,
On 2014/8/5 20:14, Zhangjie (HZ) wrote:
On 2014/8/5 17:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 02:29:28PM +0800, Zhangjie (HZ) wrote:
Jason is right, the new order is not the cause of network unreachable.
Changing order seems not work. After about 40 times, the problem occurs
On 2014/8/5 17:49, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 02:29:28PM +0800, Zhangjie (HZ) wrote:
Jason is right, the new order is not the cause of network unreachable.
Changing order seems not work. After about 40 times, the problem occurs
again.
Maybe there is other hidden
Thanks,MST! :-)
I will change the order back and have a test again.
On 2014/7/31 22:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 04:31:00PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 07:47:24PM +0800, Zhangjie (HZ) wrote:
[The test scenario]:
Doing migration between
Thank you very much!
I will post a patch tomorrow.
--Best wishes!
//Zhang Jie
-Original Message-
From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 7:45 PM
To: Zhangjie (HZ)
Cc: jasow...@redhat.com; Qinchuanyu; Liuyongan; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
net
