https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76331
--- Comment #6 from Matt mspe...@users.sourceforge.net ---
Hi Alex and David,
I've been successfully using Alex's fix for more than a month now.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/29/932
Would it be possible to close this bug by adding the patch to
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79041
Bug ID: 79041
Summary: External snapshot creation
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version: 3.2.0-23-generic
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79041
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25332
xerofo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40542
xerofo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #14
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42082
xerofo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67751
--- Comment #5 from Kashyap Chamarthy kashyap...@gmail.com ---
I just saw this again when I attempt to restart OpenvSwitch with Kernel --
3.16.0-0.rc1.git1.1.fc21.x86_64
-
[ 9695.079715]
[ 9695.080492]
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42980
xerofo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #22
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78331
Bug ID: 78331
Summary: Qemu crash in x86
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version: 2.6.32
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainline
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78331
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68051
xerofo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68051
Kashyap Chamarthy kashyap...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77871
Bug ID: 77871
Summary: USB device passthrough to Virtual GUEST system from
Linux
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version: 3.14.6 or 3.14.7
Hardware:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53601
Bug 53601 depends on bug 54521, which changed state.
Bug 54521 Summary: nVMX: accurately emulate VMXON region
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
Bandan Das b...@makefile.in changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@makefile.in
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77271
Bug ID: 77271
Summary: CPUID Leaf 0x4000 return 0 in eax
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version: 3.14
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77271
Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77271
--- Comment #2 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Oh, thanks Alex. I think you are right here, it's not a bug. But do you think
that, does it make sense to submit a patch to qemu, so as to make them
consistent between userspace qemu and
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77271
--- Comment #3 from Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com ---
The best way to find out is to submit a patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77271
Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76331
--- Comment #5 from Matt mspe...@users.sourceforge.net ---
Hi Alex,
Great news !
Yesterday I had the opportunity to recompile my kernel with your suggested fix
in intel-iommu driver : dmar_domain-gaw = min(dmar_domain-gaw, addr_width);
After
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #31 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Hi, Paolo,
I added a sti instruction in kvm-unit-tests:x86/debug.c, like this:
asm volatile(
pushf\n\t
pop %%rax\n\t
sti\n\t
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #32 from Jatin Kumar jatin.iitde...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Jidong Xiao from comment #29)
Okay, I will try the sti instruction.
Jatin, since your title says that there is something wrong with the sti
instruction, but looking at
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #33 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Jatin, thanks for the clarification. Are you using kgdb to perform single step
kernel code? I am still wondering how did you do the single step execution for
kernel level code.
--
You
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #34 from Jatin Kumar jatin.iitde...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Jidong Xiao from comment #33)
Jatin, thanks for the clarification. Are you using kgdb to perform single
step kernel code? I am still wondering how did you do the single
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #25 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Jatin Kumar from comment #24)
linux:~/code/cvedr # ./accessmsr
Segmentation fault
You got a seg fault because it is privileged instruction and I run it in
kernel mode
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #26 from Jatin Kumar jatin.iitde...@gmail.com ---
In arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c file, there is a complete list of kvm_vmx_exit_handlers,
you can find there appropriate handlers for each of the exit reasons. There is
a handle_io() handler. Can
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #27 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Jatin, after I have added printk in handle_io, it looks like the printk will be
called very frequently, I don't need to run any own program in the guest OS,
the printk message in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #28 from Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org ---
As Jatin said, most of the time the emulator is not invoked for instructions
that require intervention of the hypervisor. Instead, the processor provides
enough pre-decoded information about
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #29 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Okay, I will try the sti instruction.
Jatin, since your title says that there is something wrong with the sti
instruction, but looking at your sample code, it does not include a sti
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76331
Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #18 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Hi, Paolo,
I am still reading the source code so as to understand the root cause of this
problem. In particular, I added some printk statements in x86_emulate_insn().
For example, I added
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #19 from Jatin Kumar jatin.iitde...@gmail.com ---
I am not sure if I am correct but `add` doesn't look like any privileged or
special instruction so if running with KVM it should run directly on the
hardware and without needing
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #20 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Jatin, I actually tried some other instructions, like accessing cr
register. I use the following program:
linux:~/code/cvedr # cat getcr.c
#include stdio.h
main(){
asm
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #21 from Jatin Kumar jatin.iitde...@gmail.com ---
The way I would approach this problem is to first check if there is a VM_EXIT
while executing this instruction. You should be able to find that in
vmx_vcpu_run() function (I guess in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #22 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Alright, I added a printk statement in the wrmsr case, like this:
case 0x30:
printk(KERN_ERR DEBUG: Passed %s %d
\n,__FUNCTION__,__LINE__);
/*
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #23 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Jatin, do you mean that if one instruction triggers a VM_EXIT, then it won't
trigger the emulate code? So why the emulate code tries to emulate those
privileged instructions, like wrmsr,
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #24 from Jatin Kumar jatin.iitde...@gmail.com ---
linux:~/code/cvedr # ./accessmsr
Segmentation fault
You got a seg fault because it is privileged instruction and I run it in kernel
mode not user mode. But you are likely to be
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76621
--- Comment #2 from Henrik hne.jwe...@eit.se ---
It works with kernel version 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64.
It does not work with kernel version 3.14.4-200.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76621
Henrik hne.jwe...@eit.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|Very latest with Fedora 20 |3.14.4-200.fc20 (Very
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76621
--- Comment #3 from Henrik hne.jwe...@eit.se ---
I have updated header with kernel version. Will see if I can report it to
Fedora then.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76621
Henrik hne.jwe...@eit.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|3.14.4-200.fc20 (Very |3.14.4-200.fc20
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76621
Henrik hne.jwe...@eit.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|No |Yes
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76621
--- Comment #4 from Henrik hne.jwe...@eit.se ---
I have nw reported this at fedora insted.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100228
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76621
--- Comment #5 from Henrik hne.jwe...@eit.se ---
It still works with 3.14.3-200.fc20.x86_64 if that was of any interest.
Will now close this report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76621
Henrik hne.jwe...@eit.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76331
--- Comment #3 from Matt mspe...@users.sourceforge.net ---
Hi Alex,
Any news ?
Do you need additional info ?
I keep receiving the bug each time I power off the VM (VM is working perfectly
fine before the shutdown with both sound and gpu
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org ---
Hi Jidong, no this is not fixed yet. Basically OUT instructions are emulated
by KVM, and support for single-stepping and breakpoints in the emulator is
quite minimal.
3.12 added some support
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76621
Bug ID: 76621
Summary: Bridged networking stopped working after yum update
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version: Very latest with Fedora 20 yum update 2014-05-21
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #8 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Hi, Jatin,
from inside the OS means from within the Guest OS right?
(In reply to Jatin Kumar from comment #5)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #9 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Hi, Paolo,
It seems that Gleb's patch
commit 03617c188f41eeeb4223c919ee7e66e5a114f2c6
KVM: VMX: mark unusable segment as nonpresent
fixed a similar problem like this, look at this:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org ---
No, hardware error 0x8021 includes pretty much everything that could go
wrong in vmx.c. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #11 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Hi, Paolo, thanks for your explanation. I am interested in fixing this. So
what's the technical challenge here?
When you say support for single-stepping and breakpoints in the emulator is
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org ---
Hi, Paolo, thanks for your explanation. I am interested in fixing this. So
what's the technical challenge here?
The first step is to reproduce the failure. To do this you can make a
patch
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #13 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Great, I will try. Yes I have the inter manual and I have studied it for a
while, so basically I know the data structure of VMCS. To reproduce the
failure, so, if I use gdb in a guest OS,
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #14 from Jatin Kumar jatin.iitde...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Jidong Xiao from comment #8)
Hi, Jatin,
from inside the OS means from within the Guest OS right?
(In reply to Jatin Kumar from comment #5)
Hello Jidong,
Yes it means
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org ---
if I use gdb in a guest OS, like to debug a program inside the Guest OS, and
run the single step command in gdb, that should trigger this bug right
Yes. For kvm-unit-tests you would
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76621
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@tls.msk.ru
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #16 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Alright, thank you Paolo, I will try and let you know once I am done.(In reply
to Paolo Bonzini from comment #15)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #17 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Hi,Paolo,
I am not familiar with kvm-unit-tests, and I cannot find any documents describe
it. So I use gdb to debug.
And yes I can reproduce the problem. I just use Jatin's sample code
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #2 from Jatin Kumar jatin.iitde...@gmail.com ---
Hello Jidong, thanks for the info. I will try and let you know.
While you are at this, can you please help me another single stepping issue and
the issue is:
1. While single stepping,
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45931
Zhou, Chao chao.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chao.z...@intel.com
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75981
--- Comment #4 from Zhou, Chao chao.z...@intel.com ---
kvm.git + qemu.git: d9f89b88_e5bfd640
host kernel:3.15.0_rc1
test on Romley_EP, create a 64bit rhel6u5 guest as L2 guest, the L2 guest boots
up fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75981
Zhou, Chao chao.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75981
--- Comment #5 from Zhou, Chao chao.z...@intel.com ---
this commit fixed the bug:
commit d9f89b88f5102ce235b75a5907838e3c7ed84b97
Author: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
Date: Sat May 10 09:24:34 2014 +0200
KVM: x86: Fix CR3 reserved bits
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75981
Zhou, Chao chao.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53601
Bug 53601 depends on bug 45931, which changed state.
Bug 45931 Summary: Nested Virt: VMX can't be initialized in L1 Xen (Xen on
KVM)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45931
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45931
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonz...@gnu.org
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #4 from Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com ---
Jatin, are you using gdb to do the single step?(In reply to Jatin Kumar from
comment #2)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30402
Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jidong.x...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30402
--- Comment #3 from Joerg Roedel j...@8bytes.org ---
(In reply to Jidong Xiao from comment #2)
Joerg, how do you know this?
Some investigation showed that this kernel uses MMX instructions to access
MMIO regions. These instructions are not
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #5 from Jatin Kumar jatin.iitde...@gmail.com ---
@Paolo: Thanks for the info. That makes sense to me.
(In reply to Jidong Xiao from comment #4)
Jatin, are you using gdb to do the single step?(In reply to Jatin Kumar from
comment #2)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
--- Comment #6 from Jatin Kumar jatin.iitde...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Jatin Kumar from comment #5)
whenever I hit an out instruction, the very next instruction is not skipped
Sorry I meant 'is skipped'.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53191
Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jidong.x...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65561
Jidong Xiao jidong.x...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jidong.x...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76331
Bug ID: 76331
Summary: kernel BUG at drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c:844!
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version: 3.14.4
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76331
Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76331
--- Comment #2 from Matt mspe...@users.sourceforge.net ---
Hi Alex,
# dmesg | grep ecap
[0.057396] dmar: IOMMU 0: reg_base_addr fbfff000 ver 1:0 cap c9008010e60262
ecap f020fa
[0.057403] dmar: IOMMU 1: reg_base_addr fbffe000 ver 1:0 cap
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76191
Julian d...@psyrium.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76141
Bug ID: 76141
Summary: kvm intel nested virtualization get PANIC: double
fault, error_code: 0x0
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version: 3.12.18
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76141
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonz...@gnu.org
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76191
Bug ID: 76191
Summary: vt-d intel IOMMU - jump label: negative count!
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version: Linux venus 3.12-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.12.9-1
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75981
Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.kis...@web.de
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75981
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonz...@gnu.org
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75981
Bug ID: 75981
Summary: [Nested kvm on kvm]L2 guest reboot continuously when
create a rhel6u5(64bit) as L2 guest.
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75981
--- Comment #1 from Zhou, Chao chao.z...@intel.com ---
the first bad commit is:
commit 346874c9507a2582d0c00021f848de6e115f276c
Author: Nadav Amit na...@cs.technion.ac.il
Date: Fri Apr 18 03:35:09 2014 +0300
KVM: x86: Fix CR3 reserved bits
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73721
--- Comment #4 from Marcus Schmidt anickn...@gmail.com ---
Thanks, now everything works good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73721
Paolo Bonzini bonz...@gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75331
--- Comment #1 from Ivan Kalvachev i...@yahoo.com ---
I tried to isolate the difference in .o object files when compiling the kernel
with and without the above commit. Unfortunately there were no differences
(only in version, boot and init code).
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75331
Bug ID: 75331
Summary: soft lockup CPU#0 stuck for 23s regression on 32bit
3.13.0+ kernels.
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel Version: 3.13.0+
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75331
Ivan Kalvachev i...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@yahoo.com
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74251
robert...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65081
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Haid d.h...@gogi.tv ---
The problem persists with linux 3.14.1 and qemu 1.7.1.
Any suggestions on which further information you need is very welcome.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65081
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Haid d.h...@gogi.tv ---
I removed all unnecessary arguments. The following command line is actually
sufficient to produce hanging guests:
qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -kernel vmlinuz-linux -initrd
initramfs-linux.img
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65081
Daniel Haid d.h...@gogi.tv changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|3.12|3.14
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74251
Bug ID: 74251
Summary: Assign I350 NIC VF and Intel 82599 NIC VF to win7/win8
32bit guest, the interface cannot get IP
Product: Virtualization
Version: unspecified
Kernel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73331
Shesha shes...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shes...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73721
--- Comment #1 from flyse...@gmx.de ---
I can confirm the problem. It happens on my gentoo system as well. Let me know,
if you want me to create debug logs or similar.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the
301 - 400 of 1236 matches
Mail list logo
