On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:23 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote:
>> I'm slightly surprised this isn't called from postprocess
>> in the test? Any downside to doing that?
>
> In the second patch I do the change to make the test to use the
> p
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:23 -0700, Martin Bligh wrote:
> I'm slightly surprised this isn't called from postprocess
> in the test? Any downside to doing that?
In the second patch I do the change to make the test to use the
postprocessing module.
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Lucas Meneghel Ro
I'm slightly surprised this isn't called from postprocess
in the test? Any downside to doing that?
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
wrote:
> This module contains code to postprocess IOzone data
> in a convenient way so we can generate performance graphs
> and condensed da
