Hi Linus,
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:51:58 -0500 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com
wrote:
We've had this in linux-next for 2+ weeks (thanks Stephen!) as a
linux-stable like queue of patches, and as can be seen here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git
[Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include linux/init.h]
On 05/02/2014 (Wed 07:41) Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Ingo,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:06:33 +0100 Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
So, if you meant Linus
We've had this in linux-next for 2+ weeks (thanks Stephen!) as a
linux-stable like queue of patches, and as can be seen here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git
most of the changes in the last week have been trivial adding acks
or dropping patches that maintainers
* Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote:
On Feb 4, 2014 3:52 PM, Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com
wrote:
We've had this in linux-next for 2+ weeks (thanks Stephen!) as a
linux-stable like queue of patches, and as can be seen here:
Hi Ingo,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:06:33 +0100 Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
So, if you meant Linus to pull it, you probably want to cite a real
Git URI along the lines of:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulg/init.git
Paul provided the proper git url further down in
* Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Ingo,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:06:33 +0100 Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
So, if you meant Linus to pull it, you probably want to cite a real
Git URI along the lines of:
