On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 04:00:45AM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote:
- Yolkfull Chow yz...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:45:23AM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote:
- Yolkfull Chow yz...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Michael, I just have some comments on what you changed
- Yolkfull Chow yz...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Michael, I just have some comments on what you changed on
stress_boot. :-)
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:58:21AM +0300, Michael Goldish wrote:
Take an additional parameter 'clone_address_index_base' which
indicates the
initial value for
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:45:23AM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote:
- Yolkfull Chow yz...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Michael, I just have some comments on what you changed on
stress_boot. :-)
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:58:21AM +0300, Michael Goldish wrote:
Take an additional
- Yolkfull Chow yz...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:45:23AM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote:
- Yolkfull Chow yz...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Michael, I just have some comments on what you changed on
stress_boot. :-)
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:58:21AM
Take an additional parameter 'clone_address_index_base' which indicates the
initial value for 'address_index' for the cloned VMs. This value is
incremented after each clone is created. I assume the original VM has a single
NIC; otherwise NICs will end up sharing MAC addresses, which is bad.
Hi Michael, I just have some comments on what you changed on
stress_boot. :-)
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:58:21AM +0300, Michael Goldish wrote:
Take an additional parameter 'clone_address_index_base' which indicates the
initial value for 'address_index' for the cloned VMs. This value is
