Re: [PATCH] [RFC] KVM test: Control files automatic generation to save memory

2010-02-18 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:07 -0500, Michael Goldish wrote: - Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com wrote: As our configuration system generates a list of dicts with test parameters, and that list might be potentially *very* large, keeping all this information in memory might be a

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] KVM test: Control files automatic generation to save memory

2010-02-18 Thread Michael Goldish
- Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:07 -0500, Michael Goldish wrote: - Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com wrote: As our configuration system generates a list of dicts with test parameters, and that list might be potentially

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] KVM test: Control files automatic generation to save memory

2010-02-14 Thread Michael Goldish
- Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com wrote: As our configuration system generates a list of dicts with test parameters, and that list might be potentially *very* large, keeping all this information in memory might be a problem for smaller virtualization hosts due to the memory

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] KVM test: Control files automatic generation to save memory

2010-02-14 Thread Dor Laor
On 02/14/2010 07:07 PM, Michael Goldish wrote: - Lucas Meneghel Rodriguesl...@redhat.com wrote: As our configuration system generates a list of dicts with test parameters, and that list might be potentially *very* large, keeping all this information in memory might be a problem for

[PATCH] [RFC] KVM test: Control files automatic generation to save memory

2010-02-10 Thread Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
As our configuration system generates a list of dicts with test parameters, and that list might be potentially *very* large, keeping all this information in memory might be a problem for smaller virtualization hosts due to the memory pressure created. Tests made on my 4GB laptop show that most of