> If the null test is needed, the call to cancel_delayed_work_sync would have
> already crashed. Normally, the destroy function should only be called
> if the init functoin has succeeded, in which case ioapic is not null.
Does your commit message need a small fix?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscri
On 27/04/2015 22:35, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> If the null test is needed, the call to cancel_delayed_work_sync would have
> already crashed. Normally, the destroy function should only be called
> if the init functoin has succeeded, in which case ioapic is not null.
>
> Pro
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:35:34PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> If the null test is needed, the call to cancel_delayed_work_sync would have
> already crashed. Normally, the destroy function should only be called
> if the init functoin has succeeded, in which case ioapic is
From: Julia Lawall
If the null test is needed, the call to cancel_delayed_work_sync would have
already crashed. Normally, the destroy function should only be called
if the init functoin has succeeded, in which case ioapic is not null.
Problem found using Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall