On 06/06/12 00:38, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-25 16:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
According to Alexey, the T310 does not properly support INTx masking as
it fails to keep the PCI_STATUS_INTERRUPT bit updated once the interrupt
is masked. Mark this adapter as broken so that pci_intx_mask_supported
On 2012-05-25 16:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
According to Alexey, the T310 does not properly support INTx masking as
it fails to keep the PCI_STATUS_INTERRUPT bit updated once the interrupt
is masked. Mark this adapter as broken so that pci_intx_mask_supported
won't report it as compatible.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:51:09AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-28 15:39, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 03:29:58PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-28 15:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:51:25PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-28
On 2012-05-28 15:39, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 03:29:58PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-28 15:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:51:25PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-28 14:39, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:02:13AM -0300, Jan Kiszka wrote:
According to Alexey, the T310 does not properly support INTx masking as
it fails to keep the PCI_STATUS_INTERRUPT bit updated once the interrupt
is masked. Mark this adapter as broken so that pci_intx_mask_supported
won't report it as
On 2012-05-28 14:39, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:02:13AM -0300, Jan Kiszka wrote:
According to Alexey, the T310 does not properly support INTx masking as
it fails to keep the PCI_STATUS_INTERRUPT bit updated once the interrupt
is masked. Mark this adapter as broken so
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:51:25PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-28 14:39, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:02:13AM -0300, Jan Kiszka wrote:
According to Alexey, the T310 does not properly support INTx masking as
it fails to keep the PCI_STATUS_INTERRUPT bit
On 2012-05-28 15:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:51:25PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-28 14:39, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:02:13AM -0300, Jan Kiszka wrote:
According to Alexey, the T310 does not properly support INTx masking as
it
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 03:29:58PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-28 15:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:51:25PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-28 14:39, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:02:13AM -0300, Jan Kiszka wrote:
According to
According to Alexey, the T310 does not properly support INTx masking as
it fails to keep the PCI_STATUS_INTERRUPT bit updated once the interrupt
is masked. Mark this adapter as broken so that pci_intx_mask_supported
won't report it as compatible.
Reported-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy a...@ozlabs.ru
On 2012-05-25 11:11, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com wrote:
According to Alexey, the T310 does not properly support INTx masking as
it fails to keep the PCI_STATUS_INTERRUPT bit updated once the interrupt
is masked. Mark this adapter as
11 matches
Mail list logo
