Re: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework

2010-01-26 Thread Izik Eidus
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:14:47 +0200 Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/25/2010 10:40 PM, Izik Eidus wrote: > > > >> Or is this a feature you need? > >> > > > > I dont need it (I asked Avi to do something), So he said he want to nuke > > the aliasing > > from kvm and keep supporting the old userspace

Re: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework

2010-01-26 Thread Avi Kivity
On 01/25/2010 10:40 PM, Izik Eidus wrote: Or is this a feature you need? I dont need it (I asked Avi to do something), So he said he want to nuke the aliasing from kvm and keep supporting the old userspace`s Do you have any other way to achive this? Btw I do realize it might be bette

Re: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework

2010-01-25 Thread Izik Eidus
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:49:25 -0200 Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:40:32PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:20:39 -0200 > > Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > With current code, if a memslot is deleted, access through any aliases > > > that use it will fail

Re: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework

2010-01-25 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:40:32PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:20:39 -0200 > Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > With current code, if a memslot is deleted, access through any aliases > > that use it will fail (BTW it looks this is not properly handled, but > > thats a separate pro

Re: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework

2010-01-25 Thread Izik Eidus
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:20:39 -0200 Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > With current code, if a memslot is deleted, access through any aliases > that use it will fail (BTW it looks this is not properly handled, but > thats a separate problem). Yea I had some still open concerns about this code (this why I

Re: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework

2010-01-25 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
eec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Izik Eidus > > > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:49:41 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework > > > > > > This patch remove the old way of aliasing inside kvm > > > and move into using aliasing with the sam

Re: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework

2010-01-25 Thread Izik Eidus
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:45:53 -0200 Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > Izik, > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:53:44PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote: > > >From f94dcd1ccabbcdb51ed7c37c5f58f00a5c1b7eec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Izik Eidus > > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:49:41

Re: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework

2010-01-25 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
Izik, On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:53:44PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote: > >From f94dcd1ccabbcdb51ed7c37c5f58f00a5c1b7eec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Izik Eidus > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:49:41 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework > > This patch remove the old way o

[PATCH] RFC: alias rework

2010-01-25 Thread Izik Eidus
>From f94dcd1ccabbcdb51ed7c37c5f58f00a5c1b7eec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Izik Eidus Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:49:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework This patch remove the old way of aliasing inside kvm and move into using aliasing with the same virtual addresses This patch