On 05/13/2010 11:15 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/11/2010 07:52 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
- Add 's' and 'g' field checks on segment registers
- Correct SS checks for request and descriptor privilege levels
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/13/2010 11:15 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/11/2010 07:52 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
- Add 's' and 'g' field checks on segment registers
- Correct
On 05/25/2010 01:36 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
Any reference to back this up? I think rpl is valid regardless of
ss.unusable (i.e. loading selector 0003 results in an unusable segment with
rpl=3), but I don't see how dpl can be valid in an unusable segment.
Intel 64 and IA-32
On 05/11/2010 07:52 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
- Add 's' and 'g' field checks on segment registers
- Correct SS checks for request and descriptor privilege levels
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamalm.gamal...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 73 +++
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/11/2010 07:52 PM, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
- Add 's' and 'g' field checks on segment registers
- Correct SS checks for request and descriptor privilege levels
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamalm.gamal...@gmail.com
---
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 07:52:41PM +0300, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
- Add 's' and 'g' field checks on segment registers
- Correct SS checks for request and descriptor privilege levels
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal m.gamal...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 73
- Add 's' and 'g' field checks on segment registers
- Correct SS checks for request and descriptor privilege levels
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal m.gamal...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 73 +++
1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 6
