On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:51:06PM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
On 07/10/2014 04:02 PM, Joel Schopp wrote:
On 07/10/2014 03:25 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:17:04AM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
The current calculation for VTTBR_BADDR_MASK masks only 39 bits and not
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:17:04AM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
The current calculation for VTTBR_BADDR_MASK masks only 39 bits and not
all 40 bits. That last bit is important as some systems allocate
from near the top of the available address space.
This patch is necessary to run KVM on an
On 07/10/2014 03:25 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:17:04AM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
The current calculation for VTTBR_BADDR_MASK masks only 39 bits and not
all 40 bits. That last bit is important as some systems allocate
from near the top of the available address
On 07/10/2014 04:02 PM, Joel Schopp wrote:
On 07/10/2014 03:25 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:17:04AM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
The current calculation for VTTBR_BADDR_MASK masks only 39 bits and not
all 40 bits. That last bit is important as some systems allocate
The current calculation for VTTBR_BADDR_MASK masks only 39 bits and not
all 40 bits. That last bit is important as some systems allocate
from near the top of the available address space.
This patch is necessary to run KVM on an aarch64 SOC I have been testing.
Signed-off-by: Joel Schopp
