On 02/21/2011 05:47 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:47:36AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
Atomic-able hva_to_pfn() patches and allow-read-only-page patches
are merged almost the same time. But hva_to_pfn() does not handle
these two issues well together.
When @atomic
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:47:36AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
Atomic-able hva_to_pfn() patches and allow-read-only-page patches
are merged almost the same time. But hva_to_pfn() does not handle
these two issues well together.
When @atomic !@write_fault host-is-read-only-page-mapped
the
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:47:36AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
Atomic-able hva_to_pfn() patches and allow-read-only-page patches
are merged almost the same time. But hva_to_pfn() does not handle
these two issues well together.
When @atomic !@write_fault host-is-read-only-page-mapped
the
Atomic-able hva_to_pfn() patches and allow-read-only-page patches
are merged almost the same time. But hva_to_pfn() does not handle
these two issues well together.
When @atomic !@write_fault host-is-read-only-page-mapped
the code will return fault_page, actually, it will be better
if we return