Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 04/06/2015 16:31, Bandan Das wrote:
>> > VFIO has proved itself a much better option than KVM's built-in
>> > device assignment. It is mature, provides better isolation because
>> > it enforces ACS, and even the userspace code is being tested on
>> > a wider variety of
On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 16:33 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 04/06/2015 16:31, Bandan Das wrote:
> > > VFIO has proved itself a much better option than KVM's built-in
> > > device assignment. It is mature, provides better isolation because
> > > it enforces ACS, and even the userspace code is b
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> VFIO has proved itself a much better option than KVM's built-in
> device assignment. It is mature, provides better isolation because
> it enforces ACS, and even the userspace code is being tested on
> a wider variety of hardware these days than the legacy support.
>
> Dis
On 04/06/2015 16:31, Bandan Das wrote:
> > VFIO has proved itself a much better option than KVM's built-in
> > device assignment. It is mature, provides better isolation because
> > it enforces ACS, and even the userspace code is being tested on
> > a wider variety of hardware these days than th
VFIO has proved itself a much better option than KVM's built-in
device assignment. It is mature, provides better isolation because
it enforces ACS, and even the userspace code is being tested on
a wider variety of hardware these days than the legacy support.
Disable legacy device assignment by de
