On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 21:26 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-02-01 20:17, Glauber Costa wrote:
If the machine is stopped, we should not record two different tsc values
upon a save operation. The same problem happens with kvmclock.
But kvmclock is taking a different diretion, being now
If the machine is stopped, we should not record two different tsc values
upon a save operation. The same problem happens with kvmclock.
But kvmclock is taking a different diretion, being now seen as a separate
device. Since this is unlikely to happen with the tsc, I am taking the
approach here of
On 2011-02-01 20:17, Glauber Costa wrote:
If the machine is stopped, we should not record two different tsc values
upon a save operation. The same problem happens with kvmclock.
But kvmclock is taking a different diretion, being now seen as a separate
device. Since this is unlikely to happen
