On 17.06.14 13:13, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 04:38 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.06.14 13:07, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 02:24 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.06.14 23:08, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
This patch adds kernel side support for so
On 17.06.14 13:20, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 03:13 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.06.14 11:32, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 11:25 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.06.14 11:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 10:54 +0200,
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 03:13 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 17.06.14 11:32, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 11:25 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 17.06.14 11:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 10:54 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Also, wh
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 04:38 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 17.06.14 13:07, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>> On Tuesday 17 June 2014 02:24 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 14.06.14 23:08, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
This patch adds kernel side support for software breakpoint.
Design is th
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 03:02 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 11:25 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 17.06.14 11:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 10:54 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Also, why don't we use twi always or something else that a
On 17.06.14 13:07, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 02:24 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 14.06.14 23:08, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
This patch adds kernel side support for software breakpoint.
Design is that, by using an illegal instruction, we trap to hypervisor
via Emulation
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 02:24 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 14.06.14 23:08, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>> This patch adds kernel side support for software breakpoint.
>> Design is that, by using an illegal instruction, we trap to hypervisor
>> via Emulation Assistance interrupt, where we check
On 17.06.14 11:32, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 11:25 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.06.14 11:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 10:54 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Also, why don't we use twi always or something else that actually is
defined as i
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 11:25 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 17.06.14 11:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 10:54 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> Also, why don't we use twi always or something else that actually is
> >> defined as illegal instruction? I would like to see
On 17.06.14 11:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 10:54 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Also, why don't we use twi always or something else that actually is
defined as illegal instruction? I would like to see this shared with
book3s_32 PR.
twi will be directed to the guest on
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 10:54 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> Also, why don't we use twi always or something else that actually is
> defined as illegal instruction? I would like to see this shared with
> book3s_32 PR.
twi will be directed to the guest on HV no ? We want a real illegal
because th
On 14.06.14 23:08, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
This patch adds kernel side support for software breakpoint.
Design is that, by using an illegal instruction, we trap to hypervisor
via Emulation Assistance interrupt, where we check for the illegal instruction
and accordingly we return to Host or Gu
This patch adds kernel side support for software breakpoint.
Design is that, by using an illegal instruction, we trap to hypervisor
via Emulation Assistance interrupt, where we check for the illegal instruction
and accordingly we return to Host or Guest. Patch mandates use of "abs"
instruction
(pr
13 matches
Mail list logo
