On 10/02/2011 05:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:20:33PM -0400, Donald Dutile wrote:
commit f9c29774d2174df6ffc20becec20928948198914
changed the PCIe Capability structure version check
from if 2 fail, to if ==1, size=x, if ==2, size=y,
else fail.
Turns out the
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:20:33PM -0400, Donald Dutile wrote:
commit f9c29774d2174df6ffc20becec20928948198914
changed the PCIe Capability structure version check
from if 2 fail, to if ==1, size=x, if ==2, size=y,
else fail.
Turns out the 82599's VF has an errata where it's
PCIe Cap struct
commit f9c29774d2174df6ffc20becec20928948198914
changed the PCIe Capability structure version check
from if 2 fail, to if ==1, size=x, if ==2, size=y,
else fail.
Turns out the 82599's VF has an errata where it's
PCIe Cap struct version is 0, which now fails device assignment
due to the else
* Donald Dutile (ddut...@redhat.com) wrote:
commit f9c29774d2174df6ffc20becec20928948198914
changed the PCIe Capability structure version check
from if 2 fail, to if ==1, size=x, if ==2, size=y,
else fail.
Turns out the 82599's VF has an errata where it's
PCIe Cap struct version is 0, which
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 20:20 -0400, Donald Dutile wrote:
commit f9c29774d2174df6ffc20becec20928948198914
changed the PCIe Capability structure version check
from if 2 fail, to if ==1, size=x, if ==2, size=y,
else fail.
Turns out the 82599's VF has an errata where it's
PCIe Cap struct version