On 09/07/2009 10:05 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 12:30 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:34:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
When adding a vector fails, the used counter should
not be incremented, otherwise on vector change we will
try t
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 12:30 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:34:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > When adding a vector fails, the used counter should
> > not be incremented, otherwise on vector change we will
> > try to update the routing entry.
> >
> > Signed-off
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 04:22:36PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:30:52PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:34:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > When adding a vector fails, the used counter should
> > > not be incremented, otherwis
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:30:52PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:34:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > When adding a vector fails, the used counter should
> > not be incremented, otherwise on vector change we will
> > try to update the routing entry.
> >
> > Sig
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:34:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> When adding a vector fails, the used counter should
> not be incremented, otherwise on vector change we will
> try to update the routing entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Applied, thanks.
> ---
> hw/msix.c | 10
When adding a vector fails, the used counter should
not be incremented, otherwise on vector change we will
try to update the routing entry.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
hw/msix.c | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/msix.c b/hw/msix.c
inde
