On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:35:36PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Due to MQ support we may allocate a whole bunch of rx queues but
never use them. With this patch we'll safe the space used by
the receive buffers until they are actually in use:
sh-4.2# free -h
total used
Hi guys,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:49:23AM +0100, Sasha Levin wrote:
On 04/23/2013 12:13 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
We don't free up buffers when we're reducing queues, but I consider that
a corner case.
It didn't bother anyone up until now, and the spec doesn't state anything
about it -
On 04/23/2013 03:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:35:36PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
Due to MQ support we may allocate a whole bunch of rx queues but
never use them. With this patch we'll safe the space used by
the receive buffers until they are actually in use:
Due to MQ support we may allocate a whole bunch of rx queues but
never use them. With this patch we'll safe the space used by
the receive buffers until they are actually in use:
sh-4.2# free -h
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 490M35M
Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com writes:
Due to MQ support we may allocate a whole bunch of rx queues but
never use them. With this patch we'll safe the space used by
the receive buffers until they are actually in use:
Idea is good, implementation needs a tiny tweak:
@@ -912,8 +913,13 @@
On 04/23/2013 12:13 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Sasha Levin sasha.le...@oracle.com writes:
Due to MQ support we may allocate a whole bunch of rx queues but
never use them. With this patch we'll safe the space used by
the receive buffers until they are actually in use:
Idea is good,
