Okay, thx to hear a second opinion.
Then everything is ok, have a nice day.
regards Stephan
On 01/16/12 10:58, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:44:50PM +0100, Stephan Bärwolf wrote:
>> Thank you for applying this, Marcelo.
>>
>> I fear we (or me after I agreed) did some mistak
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:44:50PM +0100, Stephan Bärwolf wrote:
> Thank you for applying this, Marcelo.
>
> I fear we (or me after I agreed) did some mistake by erasing the additional
> cpuid 0x8001 checks.
> In contradiction to only AMD it MUST also apply on Intel-CPUs.
>
> Documentation
>
Thank you for applying this, Marcelo.
I fear we (or me after I agreed) did some mistake by erasing the additional
cpuid 0x8001 checks.
In contradiction to only AMD it MUST also apply on Intel-CPUs.
Documentation
"http://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/manual/64-ia-32-architectures-software-deve
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 04:56:33PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Stephan Baerwolf (2):
> > KVM: extend "struct x86_emulate_ops" with "get_cpuid"
> > KVM: fix missing "illegal instruction"-trap in protected modes
> >
> > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 19
> > arch/x86/kvm/emula
On 2012-01-12 16:43, Stephan Bärwolf wrote:
> From d62ca9897e9970d777aec1d399318b0df44489bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stephan Baerwolf
> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:32:46 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 0/2] KVM guest-kernel panics double fault
>
> regarding: https://lkml.org/l
>From d62ca9897e9970d777aec1d399318b0df44489bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Baerwolf
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:32:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] KVM guest-kernel panics double fault
regarding: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/28/170
On tested computers (Intel Core i5-2520M, Intel X
>From 2168285ffb30716f30e129c3ce98ce42d19c4d4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Baerwolf
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:13:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] KVM guest-kernel panics double fault
regarding: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/28/170
On tested computers (Intel Core i5-2520M, Intel X