On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 05:51:46PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Avi, Hi Marcelo,
>
> here is the re-spin I promised. The change to V1 are essentially the
> renames:
>
> kvm_vcpu_enter_gm -> enter_guest_mode
> kvm_vcpu_leave_gm -> leave_guest_mode
> kvm_vcpu_is_gm-> is_gue
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 06:38:30AM -0500, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> Can you please say a few words why you'd want to move this nested-exit
> request bit to x86.c?
I don't want to move the actual exit-code itself into generic code. This
code is different between svm and vmx. I think we could implement
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010, Roedel, Joerg wrote about "Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: Introduce
VCPU-wide notion of guest-mode V2":
> Btw, another idea which came up recently was to concentrate the actuall
> vmexit emulation at a single point. Every code place which does the exit
> directly to
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 03:01:49AM -0500, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010, Joerg Roedel wrote about "[PATCH 0/3] KVM: Introduce
> VCPU-wide notion of guest-mode V2":
> > Hi Avi, Hi Marcelo,
> >
> > here is the re-spin I promised. The chang
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010, Joerg Roedel wrote about "[PATCH 0/3] KVM: Introduce
VCPU-wide notion of guest-mode V2":
> Hi Avi, Hi Marcelo,
>
> here is the re-spin I promised. The change to V1 are essentially the
> renames:
>
> kvm_vcpu_enter_gm -> enter_guest
Hi Avi, Hi Marcelo,
here is the re-spin I promised. The change to V1 are essentially the
renames:
kvm_vcpu_enter_gm -> enter_guest_mode
kvm_vcpu_leave_gm -> leave_guest_mode
kvm_vcpu_is_gm-> is_guest_mode
No other changes are in this patch-set compared to V1.
Regards
