On 09/02/2014 11:42 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/08/2014 12:31, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>> David and Xiao, here's my take on the MMIO generation patches. Now
>> with documentation, too. :) Please review!
>>
>> David Matlack (2):
>> kvm: fix potentially corrupt mmio cache
>> kvm: x86: fi
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 02/09/2014 18:47, David Matlack ha scritto:
>>> > Ping?
>> Sorry for the delay. I think the patches look good. And patch 3/3 still
>> fixes the bug I was originally seeing, so I'm happy :). I just had one
>> small comment (see my reply to p
Il 02/09/2014 18:47, David Matlack ha scritto:
>> > Ping?
> Sorry for the delay. I think the patches look good. And patch 3/3 still
> fixes the bug I was originally seeing, so I'm happy :). I just had one
> small comment (see my reply to patch 2/3).
>
I answered that question now. Can I add your
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/08/2014 12:31, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>> David and Xiao, here's my take on the MMIO generation patches. Now
>> with documentation, too. :) Please review!
>>
>> David Matlack (2):
>> kvm: fix potentially corrupt mmio cache
>> kvm
Il 29/08/2014 12:31, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> David and Xiao, here's my take on the MMIO generation patches. Now
> with documentation, too. :) Please review!
>
> David Matlack (2):
> kvm: fix potentially corrupt mmio cache
> kvm: x86: fix stale mmio cache bug
>
> Paolo Bonzini (1):
> K
David and Xiao, here's my take on the MMIO generation patches. Now
with documentation, too. :) Please review!
David Matlack (2):
kvm: fix potentially corrupt mmio cache
kvm: x86: fix stale mmio cache bug
Paolo Bonzini (1):
KVM: do not bias the generation number in kvm_current_mmio_generat
