On 18.11.2013, at 19:36, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 11:01 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
From: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com
v2-v3
- Returning pte pointer rather than pte as suggested by Scott
- Also removed PAGE_SPLITTING as this need to
On 18.11.2013, at 19:36, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 11:01 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
From: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com
v2-v3
- Returning pte pointer rather than pte as suggested by Scott
- Also removed PAGE_SPLITTING as this need to
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 11:01 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
From: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com
v2-v3
- Returning pte pointer rather than pte as suggested by Scott
- Also removed PAGE_SPLITTING as this need to be handled by caller
v1-v2
- Removed _PAGE_BUSY loop as
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 11:01 +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
From: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com
v2-v3
- Returning pte pointer rather than pte as suggested by Scott
- Also removed PAGE_SPLITTING as this need to be handled by caller
v1-v2
- Removed _PAGE_BUSY loop as
From: Bharat Bhushan bharat.bhus...@freescale.com
v2-v3
- Returning pte pointer rather than pte as suggested by Scott
- Also removed PAGE_SPLITTING as this need to be handled by caller
v1-v2
- Removed _PAGE_BUSY loop as suggested by PaulS.
- Added check for PAGE_SPLITTING
kvm: powerpc: