Re: [PATCH 0/5] for_each_shadow_entry

2008-12-28 Thread Avi Kivity
Marcelo Tosatti wrote: On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 03:23:34PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: This patchset replaces walk_shadow(), which calls a callback for each shadow pte that maps a guest virtal address, by an equivalent for_each style construct. Benefits are less thunks and smaller code. Please

Re: [PATCH 0/5] for_each_shadow_entry

2008-12-27 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 03:23:34PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: This patchset replaces walk_shadow(), which calls a callback for each shadow pte that maps a guest virtal address, by an equivalent for_each style construct. Benefits are less thunks and smaller code. Please review. Looks good.

[PATCH 0/5] for_each_shadow_entry

2008-12-25 Thread Avi Kivity
This patchset replaces walk_shadow(), which calls a callback for each shadow pte that maps a guest virtal address, by an equivalent for_each style construct. Benefits are less thunks and smaller code. Please review. Avi Kivity (5): KVM: MMU: Add for_each_shadow_entry(), a simpler alternative