2015-01-30 10:22+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
On 29/01/2015 22:48, Radim Krčmář wrote:
This patch series is made our of three logical parts,
[1-3/8] are just a cleanup and could be omitted
[4-6/8] improve broadcast detection and unoptimized delivery
[7-8/8] handle mixed mode (by falling back
On 30/01/2015 16:20, Radim Krčmář wrote:
+ /* XXX: A superset of x2APIC broadcasts is fine in practice as long as
+ * we don't support APIC ID 0xfeff.
+ */
It's ugly. :)
Yeah, there is: don't deliver x2APIC broadcasts to xAPIC.
(I'm not even sure if it is correct ...)
On 29/01/2015 22:48, Radim Krčmář wrote:
This patch series is made our of three logical parts,
[1-3/8] are just a cleanup and could be omitted
[4-6/8] improve broadcast detection and unoptimized delivery
[7-8/8] handle mixed mode (by falling back to improvements from [5-6/9])
I applied
This patch series is made our of three logical parts,
[1-3/8] are just a cleanup and could be omitted
[4-6/8] improve broadcast detection and unoptimized delivery
[7-8/8] handle mixed mode (by falling back to improvements from [5-6/9])
Radim Krčmář (8):
KVM: x86: return bool from
